Reflection of the Social Effects of War on Art in the Context of Art Sociology

Talking about the existence of art since the cave period is a universally common judgment. It is said that reaching this judgment comes with understanding living collectively or living in an area. Therefore, in the first place, a conversation showed its existence in the language of communication, which provides the opportunity to understand each other, and then it turned into an art field that is a tool for people to express their aesthetics and feelings. Even when the art is being examined within itself, it has been divided into parts and examined under sub-headings such as movements and understandings. In this way, it has become a narrative tool that expresses the periods of people. It has shown that man does not do anything in the universe for no reason and is connected with a cause. Research has been shaped by the idea that man has not produced anything without a purpose; he does not produce. In this study, it is seen that he made a sociological-based evaluation of art projection and worked in sociology. For this purpose, the effects of the war on individuals and the sociological context of Pablo Picasso's "Guernica," Diego Rivera's "National Palace," Francisco Goya's "May 3, 1808" were analyzed. [For the complete volume, "Proceedings of International Conference on Studies in Education and Social Sciences (Antalya, Turkey, November 11-14, 2021). Volume 1," see ED625228.]