ALI SE PRAVO V ČASU VOJNE RAZLIKUJE OD PRAVA V ČASU MIRU zakonodaja 1916-1917 ; DOES LAW IN WARTIME DIFFER FROM LAW IN TIME OF PEACE

Naloga katere namen je ugotoviti ali se pravo v času vojne razlikuje od prava v času miru, zajema primerjavo zakonodaje v času prve svetove vojne na podlagi izbranih predpisov uradnih listov izdanih v letih 1916 in 1917, ter veljavnih predpisov današnje zakonodaje. V prvem delu naloga obravnava terminologijo, ki se pojavlja v času vojne ter ustrezno terminologijo, ki jo najdemo v veljavni zakonodaji v času miru. V nadaljevanju se naloga nanaša na povzemanje zakonodaje iz časa vojne , pri čemer sem iz uradnih listov izdanih v letih 1916 in 1917 izbrala sedem tem in jih razporedila pod ustrezne pravne panoge. Na podlagi omenjenega pa sem kot sledeče poiskala danes veljavno zakonodajo, ki se nanaša na obravnavano tematiko. Nanizanju primerov predpisov iz obeh obravnavanih obdobij je sledila primerjalna analiza, ki je pripeljala do izsledkov glede sorodnosti oziroma razlik v zakonodaji iz časa vojne in veljavni zakonodaji v času miru. Skozi primerjalno analizo sem prišla do sklepa, da se pravo v času vojne in v času miru sicer razlikujeta, vendar razlikovanja med omenjenima pravoma z izjemo prisilnega upravljanja ne moremo posploševati na vso obravnavano tematiko, ter na celotno vsebino primerjanih predpisov. Do razlik je zaradi časovnega preskoka med predpisi prihajalo v terminoloških izrazih – predvsem glede pristojnosti, v obsegu obravnavanih institutov, ki jih aktualna zakonodaja obravnava v več predpisih, v kazenskih določilih, ki so v času vojne strožja ,ter v nekaterih določilih, ki pa ne predstavljajo tolikšne razlike, da bi se posamezni instituti oziroma obravnavana področja popolnoma razhajala na vsebinski ravni. ; A thesis the purpose of which is establishing whether law in wartime differentiates from law in peacetime, contains the comparison of legislation from the period of First World War, based on selected regulations in official documents issued in year 1916 and 1917, and valid regulations of modern legislation. The first part of the task handles terminology which appears in wartime, and appropriate terminology, found in valid legislation peacetime. In the following the thesis consists of summarizing legislation from wartime, from which we have selected 7 themes from official documents, issued in 1916 and 1917, and have categorized them under appropriate law branches. Based on that, we have then sought out current valid legislation, which applies to the topic at hand. After stringing examples from both eras there followed comparative analysis, which led to findings about similarities or differences in legislation in wartime and valid current legislation in peacetime. By using comparative analysis we have come to the conclusion, that although law in wartime and law in peacetime do differ, this difference, with the exception of forced administration, cannot be generalized on all the topic at hand, as well as all of content of compared regulations. Because of the time lapse among regulations there were differences in terminological expressions- particularly with regard to jurisdiction, to the extent of institutes, regulated by current legislation by various regulations, to criminal provisions that are stricter in wartime, and to certain provisions, which however do not represent big enough of a difference to cause a complete divergence on level of content of individual institutes or areas.