九一一事件後歐洲聯盟與美國在歐洲地區的反恐合作(2001-2007年) ; The counter-terrorism cooperation between EU and U.S. in Europe after 9/11 attack (2001-2007)

朱柔潔 ; Chu, Jou-chieh ; et al.

In: 參考文獻壹、中文部份一、中文專書王泰銓，2004，《從尼斯條約看歐洲聯盟變遷》，高雄：國立高雄大學財經法律學系。丹尼斯．匹茲奇維克斯作；方淑惠譯，2007，《恐怖主義與美國的角力》，台北：國防部部長辦公室。國防部譯印，2006，《美國四年期國防總檢報告》，台北：國防部部長辦公室。邱稔壤，2004，《國際反恐與亞太情勢》，台北：國立政治大學國際關係研究中心。邱伯浩，2006，《恐怖主義與反恐》，台北：新文京開發出版股份有限公司。黃偉峰，2003，《歐洲聯盟的組織與運作》，台北：五南圖書出版公司。詹姆士．史密斯、威廉．湯姆合編；謝豐安、吳福生譯，2002，《恐怖主義威脅與美國政府的回應》，台北：國防部史政編譯室。蔡政文，1988，《當前國際關係理論及其評估》，台北：三民書局。蔡政文等，2007，《全球化趨勢下之世界、區域與國家建構》，高雄：國立高雄大學政治法律學系編輯委員會。二、中文期刊刁仁國，民國93年2月，〈EUROPOL個人資料保護法制初探〉，《國境警察學報》，第2期，頁155-171。王崑義，民國91年4月，〈美國的反恐怖主義與國際安全兼論九一一事件以後臺海兩岸的處境〉，《遠景季刊》，第3卷，第2期，頁137-167。王昆義、李黎明，民國92年4月，〈想像的危機:「反恐時代」美國的危機建構與臺灣的戰略選擇〉，《遠景基金會季刊》，第4卷，第2期，頁61-109。甘逸驊，民國92年9月，〈冷戰結束後的北約與國際關係理論〉，《問題與研究》，第42卷，第5期，頁1-23。甘逸驊，民國95年9、10月，〈「歐洲安全與防衛政策」的軍事層面:歐盟的全球戰略地位〉，《問題與研究》，第45卷，第5期，頁111-136。李文志，民國91年7、8月，〈杭亭頓的戰略思想與美國全球戰略的關係〉，《問題與研究》，第41卷，第4期，頁1-20。李蒲，民國94年2月，〈國家安全新變數：恐怖主義興起以兩岸安全關係為例〉，《空軍學術月刊》，第579期，頁27-40。吳東野，民國92年1月，〈全球反恐聯盟及其相關問題之探討〉，《遠景基金會季刊》，第4卷，第1期，頁1-38。吳萬寶，民國93年6月，〈歐盟歐洲安全戰略之研究〉，《研究與動態》，第10期，頁103-117。邱稔壤，民國92年9月，〈西班牙阿斯納爾政府對巴斯克政黨支持恐怖主義之立場〉，《問題與研究》，第42卷，第4期，頁42-73。林文程，民國82年6月，〈後冷戰時期美國的國家安全策略〉，《美國月刊》，第8卷，第4期，頁4-14。林建財，民國91年1月，〈美國、賓拉登、恐怖主義〉，《歷史月刊》，第168期，頁28-33。柯慶忠，民國94年3、4月，〈國際刑警組織與歐盟警察組織〉，《刑事雙月刊》，第5期，頁12-19。柯慶忠，民國96年4月，〈歐盟引渡制度之新變革…以歐盟逮捕令為逮捕及解送之新制〉，《東吳法律學報》，第18卷，第3期，頁123-188。胡瑞舟，民國92年1月，〈反恐戰爭對美國內外互動關係的影響:一年後的分析性概述〉，《遠景基金會季刊》，第4卷，第1期，頁41-61。陳文生，民國94年9月，〈布希政府反恐安全戰略及其挑戰:伊拉克經驗的檢討〉，《政治科學論叢》，第25期，頁1-28。張中勇，民國92年3月，〈美國「九一一」事件後國土安全作為對台灣安全的啟示〉，《新世紀智庫論壇季刊》，第21期，頁59-82。鈕先鐘，民國86年11月，〈泛論恐怖主義經驗與新趨勢〉，《國防雜誌》，第13卷，第5期，頁15-26。彭正中，民國95年1月，〈後冷戰時期恐怖主義發展對國家安全的影響與省思〉，《國防雜誌》，第21卷，第1期，頁51-61。楊永明，民國95年4月，〈聯合國之保障措施與人權保障問題〉，《月旦法學雜誌》，第131期，頁21-36。鄭端耀，民國94年2月，〈國際關係新古典現實主義理論〉，《問題與研究》，第44卷，第1期，頁115-140。謝立功，民國92年9月，〈國際反恐思維之人權保障〉，《中華警政研究學會會訊》，第1期，頁19-22。蔡政修，民國93年12月，〈九一一事件後的美國國家安全戰略:以波斯灣戰爭與北韓核子危機為例〉，《問題與研究》，第43卷，第6期，頁129-165。藍玉春，民國90年12月，〈解析歐盟阿姆斯特丹條約〉，《政治科學論叢》，第15期，頁15-44。貳、英文部份一、英文專書 Alexander, Yonah; Myers A., Kenneth (eds.) (1982), Terrorism in Europe, London: Croom Helm. Alexander, Yonah (2006), Counterterrorism Strategies: Successes and Failures of Six Nations, Washington: Potomac Books. Altheide, David L. (2006), Terrorism and the politics of fear, Lanham, Md.: Altamira Press. Bunyan, Tony (1993), Statewatching the New Europe: a handbook on the European State, London: Statewatch. Buckley, Mary; Fawn, Rick (eds.) (2003), Global Responses to Terrorism: 9/11, Afghanistan and beyond, London: Routledge. Buckley, Mary; Singh, Robert (eds.) (2006), The Bush Doctrine and War on Terrorism: Global responses, global consequences, Oxon: Routledge. Bullock, Jane A.; Haddow, George D.; Coppola, Damon; Ergin, Erdem; Westerman, Lissa; Yletaysi, Sarp (eds.) (2006), Introduction to Homeland Security, Burlington: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann publications. Blakesley, Christopher (2006), Terrorism and anti-terrorism: a normative and practical assessment, N.Y.: Transnational Publishers. Baldaccini, Anneliese; Guild, Elspeth (eds.) (2007), Terrorism and the foreigner: a decade of tension around the rule of law in Europe, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff. Engene, Jan Oskar (2004), Terrorism in Western Europe: explaining the trends since 1950, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Gardner, Hall (2004), Nato and the European Union: New World, New Europe, New Threats, England: Ashgate publishing Limited. Heyman, Philip B. (2003), Terrorism, freedom, and security: winning without war, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Hamilton, Daniel S. (2006), Terrorism and International Relations, Washington, DC: Center for Transatlantic Relations. Jenkin, Brian Michael (2001), Terrorism: current and long term threats, Santa Monica, Calif. : Rand. Krahmann, Elke (2005), New Threats and New Actors in International Security, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Lansford, Tom (2002), All for One: Terrorism, NATO and the United States, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited. Lutz, Brenda J.; Lutz, James M. (eds.) (2007), Terrorism in America, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Nacos, Brigitte L. (2008), Terrorism and Counterterrorism: understanding threats and responses in the post-9/11 World, New York: Pearson Longman. Pillar, Paul R. (2001), Terrorism and U.S. foreign policy, Washington, D.C.: Brooking Institution Press. Ramraj, Victor V.; Hor, Michael; Roach, Kent (eds.) (2005), Global Anti-terrorism Law and Policy, United Kingdom: Cambridge University. Rees, Wyn (2006), Transatlantic- Counter Terrorism Cooperation: The new imperative, London: Routledge. Sabasteanski, Anna (2005), Patterns of Global Terrorism 1985-2005: U.S Department of State Reports With Supplementary Documents and Statistics, Massachusetts: Berkshire Publishing Group. Simonsen, Clifford E. (2007), Terrorism today: the past, the players, the future, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall. Tucker, H. H. (1988), Combating the Terrorists: Democratic Responses to Political Violence, New York: Center for Security Studies. Tongeren, Paul van; Veen, Hans van de; Verhoeven, Juliette (eds.) (2002), Searching for Peace in Europe and Eurasia: An Overview of Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding Activities, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Wallace, Helen; Wallace, William (eds.) (1996), Policy-Making in the European Union, New York: Oxford. White, Jonathan Randall (2006), Terrorism and homeland security, Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Thomson Learning. Wilkinson, Paul (2006), Terrorism versus democracy: the liberal state response, London: Routledge. 二、英文期刊 Archick, Kristin (2004), ‘Europe and Counter terrorism: Strengthening Police and Judicial Cooperation’, Congressional Research Service Report, Order Code: RL31509, pp. 1-34. Archick, Kristin (2005), ‘European Views and Policies Toward the Middle East’, Congressional Research Service Report, Order Code: RL31956, pp. 1-30. Alegre, Susie; Boer, Monica de; Callovi, Giuseppe; Peers, Steve; Polo, Crstina Pineda (eds.) (2005), ‘Future of CFSP’, European Policy Centre, No.15, pp. 6-70. Archick Krstin (2007), ‘U.S.-EU Cooperation Against Terrorism’, Congressional Research Service Report, Order Code: RS22030, pp. 1-6. Badie, Bertrand (2001), ‘The Paradigmatic Debate in International Relations’, International Political Science Review, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 253-260. Brown, David (2004), ‘The war on terrorism would not be possible without NATO: a critique’, Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 409-429. Carter, Ashton B. (2001-02) “The Architecture of Government in the Face of Terrorism”, International Security, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 5-23. Duffield, John S. (1994-1995), ‘NATO’s Functions after the Cold War’, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 109, No. 5, pp. 763-787. Dittrich, Mirjam (2005), ‘Facing the global terrorist threat: a European response’, European policy Centre, No. 14, pp. 4-80. Elliott, Kimberly Ann; Hufbauer, Gary Clyde (eds.) (1999), ‘Ineffectiveness of economic sanctions: Same Song, Same Refrain? Economic Sanctions in the 1990’s’, The American Economic Review, Vol. 89, No. 2, pp. 403-408. Evera, Stephen Van (2006), ‘The Bush Administration is Weak on Terror’, MIT Center For International Studies, pp. 1-7. Ek, Carl (2007), ‘NATO’s Prague Capabilities Commitment’, Congressional Research Service Report, Order Code: RS21659, pp. 1-6. Flanagan, Stephen J. (2005), ‘Sustaining U.S.-European Global Security Cooperation’, Strategic Forum, No. 217, pp. 1-6. Goldstein, Judith; Kahler, Miles; Keohane, Robert O.; Slaughter, Anne Marie (eds.) (2000), ‘Legalization and World Politics’, International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 385-399. Gallis, Paul (2005), ‘The NATO Summit at Prague, 2002’, Congressional Research Service Report, Order Code: RS21354, pp. 1-5. Hoffman, Bruce (1999), ‘Is Europe Soft on Terrorism?’, Foreign Policy, No.115, pp. 62-76. Hayes, Ben (2004), ‘From the Schengen Information System to SIS Ⅱ and the Visa Information (VIS): the proposals explained’, Statewatch analysis, pp. 3-45. Keohane, Robert O.; Martin Lisa (eds.) (1995), ‘The Promise of Institutionalist Theory’, International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 39-51. Knight, Charles; Murphy, Melissa; Mousseau, Michael (eds.) (2003), ‘The Sources of Terrorism’, International Security, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 192-198. Kuzmanov, Krassimir (2006), ‘Does NATO Have a Role in Fight Against International Terrorism: Analysis of NATO’s Response to September 11’, Information & Security, Vol. 19, pp. 61-84. Kydd, Andrew H.; Walter, Barbara F. (eds.) (2006), ‘The Strategies of Terrorism’, International Security, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 49-80. Katzman, Kenneth (2008), ‘The Iran Sanctions Act (ISA)’, Congressional Research Service Report, Order Code: RS20871, pp. 1-6. Lugna, Lauri (2006), ‘Institutional Framework of the European Union Counter-Terrorism Policy Setting’, Baltic Security&Defence Review, Vol.8, pp. 101-127. Mearsheimer, John J. (1994-1995), ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’, International Security, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 5-49. Mackarel, Mark; Nash, Susan (1997), ‘Extradition and the European Union’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 948-957. Nevers, Renee de (2007), ‘NATO’s International Security Role in the Terrorist Era’, International Security, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 34-66. Payne, Keith B. (2005), ‘Bush Administration Strategic Policy: A Reality Check’, The Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 775-787. Perl, Raphael (2005), ‘U.S. Anti-Terror Strategy and the 9/11 Commission Report’, Congressional Research Service Report, Order Code: RL32522, pp. 1-11. Ruggie, John Gerard (1995), ‘The False Premise of Realism’, International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 62-70. Roberts, Adam (2005), ‘The ‘war on Terror’ in historical perspective’, Survival, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 101-130. Rose, William; Murphy, Rysia; Abrahms, Max (eds.) (2007), ‘Does Terrorism Ever Work? The 2004 Madrid Train Bombings’, International Security, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 185-192. Smith, Michael E. (2004), ‘Institutionalization, Policy Adaptation and European Foreign Policy Cooperation’, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 95-136. Schmidt, John R. (2006-2007), ‘Last Alliance Standing? NATO after 9/11”, The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 93-106. Trager, Robert F.; Zagorcheva, Dessislava P. (eds.) (2006), ‘Deterring Terrorism: It could Be Done’, International Security, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 87-123. 參、歐盟與美國官方文件歐盟： 1995/73/JHA: Council Joint Action of 10 March 1995 concerning the Europol Drugs Unit (OJ L62, 20.3.1995). 1996/747/JHA: Council Joint Action of 29 November 1996 concerning the creation and maintenance of a directory of specialised competences, skills and expertise in the fight against international organised crime, in order to facilitate law enforcement cooperation between the Member States of the European Union (OJ L342, 31.12.1996). 2002/460/EC: COUNCIL DECISION of 17 June 2002 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2002/334/EC (OJ L160, 18.6.2002). 2002/462/CFSP: Council Common Position of 17 June 2002 updating Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism and repealing Common Position 2002/340/CFSP (OJ L160, 18.6.2002). 2002/475/JHA: Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L164, 22.6.2002). 2004/634/EC: Concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on intensifying and broadening the Agreement on customs cooperation and mutual assistance in customs matters to include cooperation on container security and related matters (OJ L304, 30.9.2004). 2005/930/EC: Council Decision of 21 December 2005 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2005/848/EC (OJ L340, 23.12.2005). 2007/551/CFSP/JHA: Council Decision on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of an Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data by air carriers to the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (2007 PNR Agreement) (OJ L204, 4.8.2007). Commission of the European Communities Communication from the Commission to the Council and the Parliament：Transfer of Air Passenger Name Record (PNR) Data：A Global EU Approach, Brussels, 16.12.2003, (COM(2003) 826 final). Commission Staff Working Paper：“An EC-U.S. Agreement on Passenger Name Record (PNR)”, Brussels, 21.1.2004, (SEC(2004) 81). Conclusions and Plan of Action of the Extraordinary European Council, Brussels, 21 September 2001, (SN140/01). Council of the European Union Declaration on Combating Terrorism, Brussels, 25 March 2004, (7906/04). Working Structures of the Council in terrorism matters, Brussels, 25 May 2004, (9791/04). EU Plan of Action on Combating Terrorism, Brussels, 29 November 2004, (14330/1/04 REV 1). The Hague Programme, Brussels, 13 December 2004, (16054/04). The European Union Counter-Terrorism Strategy, Brussels, 30 November 2005, (14469/4/05 REV 4). Europol Corporate Communications, 2006. Annual Report 2006. European Police Office, ( U0002-1601200915190300;

unknown

Wie komme ich dran?

碩士 ; 從1960至1970年代，歐洲國家皆遭受過恐怖攻擊，但當時只是將其視為各國內政問題。不過，自冷戰結束後，各國所必須面對的安全威脅變得更為廣泛，而恐怖主義也為其中一項。受到九一一事件的影響，歐盟開始制定相關反恐政策及措施，予以因應恐怖主義的發展。爾後，發生2004年馬德里爆炸案與2005年倫敦爆炸案，歐盟便積極研擬反恐政策及戰略，並且與美國簽署合作決定，藉此打擊恐怖主義。雙方如何透過這些政策、戰略、及合作決定相互增強合作，是值得探討之處。本文採取新自由制度主義為研究方法，藉此分析及探討歐盟與美國在歐洲地區的反恐合作情況。至於本文的研究內容則分為三個部份：首先，分別探討歐盟與美國在九一一事件前後的反恐政策及戰略發展，以及雙方如何透過各項合作決定來強化合作；其次，針對促成歐盟與美國合作的因素進行分析，並且說明彼此在各國際政府間組織執行反恐合作的情況；最後，則是對歐盟與美國的合作成效提出評估，以及論述未來雙方合作的展望。本文研究結果則了解到，歐盟與美國在反恐合作的過程中，難免會產生衝突。就整體情況而言，雖然雙方的合作無法完全消滅恐怖主義，但仍是可以抑制恐怖主義的發展，並且竭力為人類帶來和平及安全的生活。畢竟，打擊恐怖主義不是一件簡單的事情。 ; Although European countries had been attacked by terrorists from 1960 to 1970, they still treated it as home affairs. After the cold war, all countries have to face a more complex security environment, also include the spread of terrorism. European Union (EU) began to establish anti-terrorism policies and initiatives after 9/11 attack in order to restrain the development of terrorism. Subsequently, there were terrorist bombings in Madrid and London. EU not only establishes counter-terrorism policies and strategies with members, but also signs cooperation agreements with United States (U.S.). It will be an important view for how do they strength the mutual cooperation through these ways. This thesis is used “neo-liberalism” as research approach to analyze and discuss the counter-terrorism cooperation between EU and U.S. in Europe. This thesis has 9 chapters, and the structure is divided into 3 parts: first, it will not only analyze the development of counter-terrorism policies and strategies of EU and U.S. separately, but also discuss how they enhance cooperation through the agreements that they’ve signed. Second, it will analyze what kinds of factors promote their cooperation, and talk about how they work hard to against terrorism in intergovernmental organizations. At the end, it will not only evaluate the cooperation efficiency between EU and U.S., also estimate point of views of their future. This thesis concludes that the cooperation process between EU and U.S. would made disagreement ...

Titel:	九一一事件後歐洲聯盟與美國在歐洲地區的反恐合作(2001-2007年) ; The counter-terrorism cooperation between EU and U.S. in Europe after 9/11 attack (2001-2007)
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person:	朱柔潔 ; Chu, Jou-chieh ; 淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士班 ; 蔡政文 ; Tsai, Cheng-wen
Link:	http://www.europol.europa.eu/index.asp?page=publications&language). , 2007. Annual Report 2007. European Police Office, (http://www.europol.europa.eu/index.asp?page=publications&language). 美國： Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism, 2002. Patterns of Global Terrorism. U.S. Department of State, (http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2002/). , 2003. Patterns of Global Terrorism. U.S. Department of State, (http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2003/). , 2004. Country Reports on Terrorism. U.S. Department of State, (http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/c14818.htm). , 2005. Country Reports on Terrorism. U.S. Department of State, (http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2005/). , 2006. Country Reports on Terrorism. U.S. Department of State, (http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2006/). , 2007. Country Reports on Terrorism. U.S. Department of State, (http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2007/index.htm). Department of Defense, 1997. Annual Report to the President and the Congress. U.S. Department of State, (http://www.dod.mil/execsec/adr97/index.html). , 1999. Annual Report to the President and the Congress. U.S. Department of State, (http://www.dod.mil/execsec/adr1999/index.html). 肆、網路資源一、政府與國際政府間組織歐盟 http://europa.eu/index_en.htm/ http://www.eurunion.org/ 歐洲警署 http://www.europol.europa.eu/ 歐盟司法單位 http://eurojust.europa.eu/ 美國白宮 http://www.whitehouse.gov/ 美國國務院 http://www.state.gov/ 美國國防部 http://www.defenselink.mil/index.html/ 美國司法部 http://www.usdoj.gov/ 美國財政部 http://www.ustreas.gov/ 美國海關暨邊境保護局 http://www.cbp.gov/ 聯合國 http://www.un.org/ 北大西洋公約組織 http://www.nato.int/ 歐洲安全暨合作組織 http://www.osce.org/ 國際金融行動小組 http://www.fatf-gafi.org 二、研究機構與基金會歐洲政策研究中心 http://www.theepc.be/ Council of Foreign Relations http://www.cfr.org/ International Institute for Strategic Studies http://www.iiss.org/ Mit Center For International Studies http://web.mit.edu/ Statewatch http://www.statewatch.org The Jamestown Foundation http://jamestown.org/ http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/30889 http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/bitstream/987654321/30889/1/
Quelle:	參考文獻壹、中文部份一、中文專書王泰銓，2004，《從尼斯條約看歐洲聯盟變遷》，高雄：國立高雄大學財經法律學系。丹尼斯．匹茲奇維克斯作；方淑惠譯，2007，《恐怖主義與美國的角力》，台北：國防部部長辦公室。國防部譯印，2006，《美國四年期國防總檢報告》，台北：國防部部長辦公室。邱稔壤，2004，《國際反恐與亞太情勢》，台北：國立政治大學國際關係研究中心。邱伯浩，2006，《恐怖主義與反恐》，台北：新文京開發出版股份有限公司。黃偉峰，2003，《歐洲聯盟的組織與運作》，台北：五南圖書出版公司。詹姆士．史密斯、威廉．湯姆合編；謝豐安、吳福生譯，2002，《恐怖主義威脅與美國政府的回應》，台北：國防部史政編譯室。蔡政文，1988，《當前國際關係理論及其評估》，台北：三民書局。蔡政文等，2007，《全球化趨勢下之世界、區域與國家建構》，高雄：國立高雄大學政治法律學系編輯委員會。二、中文期刊刁仁國，民國93年2月，〈EUROPOL個人資料保護法制初探〉，《國境警察學報》，第2期，頁155-171。王崑義，民國91年4月，〈美國的反恐怖主義與國際安全兼論九一一事件以後臺海兩岸的處境〉，《遠景季刊》，第3卷，第2期，頁137-167。王昆義、李黎明，民國92年4月，〈想像的危機:「反恐時代」美國的危機建構與臺灣的戰略選擇〉，《遠景基金會季刊》，第4卷，第2期，頁61-109。甘逸驊，民國92年9月，〈冷戰結束後的北約與國際關係理論〉，《問題與研究》，第42卷，第5期，頁1-23。甘逸驊，民國95年9、10月，〈「歐洲安全與防衛政策」的軍事層面:歐盟的全球戰略地位〉，《問題與研究》，第45卷，第5期，頁111-136。李文志，民國91年7、8月，〈杭亭頓的戰略思想與美國全球戰略的關係〉，《問題與研究》，第41卷，第4期，頁1-20。李蒲，民國94年2月，〈國家安全新變數：恐怖主義興起以兩岸安全關係為例〉，《空軍學術月刊》，第579期，頁27-40。吳東野，民國92年1月，〈全球反恐聯盟及其相關問題之探討〉，《遠景基金會季刊》，第4卷，第1期，頁1-38。吳萬寶，民國93年6月，〈歐盟歐洲安全戰略之研究〉，《研究與動態》，第10期，頁103-117。邱稔壤，民國92年9月，〈西班牙阿斯納爾政府對巴斯克政黨支持恐怖主義之立場〉，《問題與研究》，第42卷，第4期，頁42-73。林文程，民國82年6月，〈後冷戰時期美國的國家安全策略〉，《美國月刊》，第8卷，第4期，頁4-14。林建財，民國91年1月，〈美國、賓拉登、恐怖主義〉，《歷史月刊》，第168期，頁28-33。柯慶忠，民國94年3、4月，〈國際刑警組織與歐盟警察組織〉，《刑事雙月刊》，第5期，頁12-19。柯慶忠，民國96年4月，〈歐盟引渡制度之新變革…以歐盟逮捕令為逮捕及解送之新制〉，《東吳法律學報》，第18卷，第3期，頁123-188。胡瑞舟，民國92年1月，〈反恐戰爭對美國內外互動關係的影響:一年後的分析性概述〉，《遠景基金會季刊》，第4卷，第1期，頁41-61。陳文生，民國94年9月，〈布希政府反恐安全戰略及其挑戰:伊拉克經驗的檢討〉，《政治科學論叢》，第25期，頁1-28。張中勇，民國92年3月，〈美國「九一一」事件後國土安全作為對台灣安全的啟示〉，《新世紀智庫論壇季刊》，第21期，頁59-82。鈕先鐘，民國86年11月，〈泛論恐怖主義經驗與新趨勢〉，《國防雜誌》，第13卷，第5期，頁15-26。彭正中，民國95年1月，〈後冷戰時期恐怖主義發展對國家安全的影響與省思〉，《國防雜誌》，第21卷，第1期，頁51-61。楊永明，民國95年4月，〈聯合國之保障措施與人權保障問題〉，《月旦法學雜誌》，第131期，頁21-36。鄭端耀，民國94年2月，〈國際關係新古典現實主義理論〉，《問題與研究》，第44卷，第1期，頁115-140。謝立功，民國92年9月，〈國際反恐思維之人權保障〉，《中華警政研究學會會訊》，第1期，頁19-22。蔡政修，民國93年12月，〈九一一事件後的美國國家安全戰略:以波斯灣戰爭與北韓核子危機為例〉，《問題與研究》，第43卷，第6期，頁129-165。藍玉春，民國90年12月，〈解析歐盟阿姆斯特丹條約〉，《政治科學論叢》，第15期，頁15-44。貳、英文部份一、英文專書 Alexander, Yonah; Myers A., Kenneth (eds.) (1982), Terrorism in Europe, London: Croom Helm. Alexander, Yonah (2006), Counterterrorism Strategies: Successes and Failures of Six Nations, Washington: Potomac Books. Altheide, David L. (2006), Terrorism and the politics of fear, Lanham, Md.: Altamira Press. Bunyan, Tony (1993), Statewatching the New Europe: a handbook on the European State, London: Statewatch. Buckley, Mary; Fawn, Rick (eds.) (2003), Global Responses to Terrorism: 9/11, Afghanistan and beyond, London: Routledge. Buckley, Mary; Singh, Robert (eds.) (2006), The Bush Doctrine and War on Terrorism: Global responses, global consequences, Oxon: Routledge. Bullock, Jane A.; Haddow, George D.; Coppola, Damon; Ergin, Erdem; Westerman, Lissa; Yletaysi, Sarp (eds.) (2006), Introduction to Homeland Security, Burlington: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann publications. Blakesley, Christopher (2006), Terrorism and anti-terrorism: a normative and practical assessment, N.Y.: Transnational Publishers. Baldaccini, Anneliese; Guild, Elspeth (eds.) (2007), Terrorism and the foreigner: a decade of tension around the rule of law in Europe, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff. Engene, Jan Oskar (2004), Terrorism in Western Europe: explaining the trends since 1950, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Gardner, Hall (2004), Nato and the European Union: New World, New Europe, New Threats, England: Ashgate publishing Limited. Heyman, Philip B. (2003), Terrorism, freedom, and security: winning without war, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Hamilton, Daniel S. (2006), Terrorism and International Relations, Washington, DC: Center for Transatlantic Relations. Jenkin, Brian Michael (2001), Terrorism: current and long term threats, Santa Monica, Calif. : Rand. Krahmann, Elke (2005), New Threats and New Actors in International Security, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Lansford, Tom (2002), All for One: Terrorism, NATO and the United States, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited. Lutz, Brenda J.; Lutz, James M. (eds.) (2007), Terrorism in America, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Nacos, Brigitte L. (2008), Terrorism and Counterterrorism: understanding threats and responses in the post-9/11 World, New York: Pearson Longman. Pillar, Paul R. (2001), Terrorism and U.S. foreign policy, Washington, D.C.: Brooking Institution Press. Ramraj, Victor V.; Hor, Michael; Roach, Kent (eds.) (2005), Global Anti-terrorism Law and Policy, United Kingdom: Cambridge University. Rees, Wyn (2006), Transatlantic- Counter Terrorism Cooperation: The new imperative, London: Routledge. Sabasteanski, Anna (2005), Patterns of Global Terrorism 1985-2005: U.S Department of State Reports With Supplementary Documents and Statistics, Massachusetts: Berkshire Publishing Group. Simonsen, Clifford E. (2007), Terrorism today: the past, the players, the future, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall. Tucker, H. H. (1988), Combating the Terrorists: Democratic Responses to Political Violence, New York: Center for Security Studies. Tongeren, Paul van; Veen, Hans van de; Verhoeven, Juliette (eds.) (2002), Searching for Peace in Europe and Eurasia: An Overview of Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding Activities, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Wallace, Helen; Wallace, William (eds.) (1996), Policy-Making in the European Union, New York: Oxford. White, Jonathan Randall (2006), Terrorism and homeland security, Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Thomson Learning. Wilkinson, Paul (2006), Terrorism versus democracy: the liberal state response, London: Routledge. 二、英文期刊 Archick, Kristin (2004), ‘Europe and Counter terrorism: Strengthening Police and Judicial Cooperation’, Congressional Research Service Report, Order Code: RL31509, pp. 1-34. Archick, Kristin (2005), ‘European Views and Policies Toward the Middle East’, Congressional Research Service Report, Order Code: RL31956, pp. 1-30. Alegre, Susie; Boer, Monica de; Callovi, Giuseppe; Peers, Steve; Polo, Crstina Pineda (eds.) (2005), ‘Future of CFSP’, European Policy Centre, No.15, pp. 6-70. Archick Krstin (2007), ‘U.S.-EU Cooperation Against Terrorism’, Congressional Research Service Report, Order Code: RS22030, pp. 1-6. Badie, Bertrand (2001), ‘The Paradigmatic Debate in International Relations’, International Political Science Review, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 253-260. Brown, David (2004), ‘The war on terrorism would not be possible without NATO: a critique’, Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 409-429. Carter, Ashton B. (2001-02) “The Architecture of Government in the Face of Terrorism”, International Security, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 5-23. Duffield, John S. (1994-1995), ‘NATO’s Functions after the Cold War’, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 109, No. 5, pp. 763-787. Dittrich, Mirjam (2005), ‘Facing the global terrorist threat: a European response’, European policy Centre, No. 14, pp. 4-80. Elliott, Kimberly Ann; Hufbauer, Gary Clyde (eds.) (1999), ‘Ineffectiveness of economic sanctions: Same Song, Same Refrain? Economic Sanctions in the 1990’s’, The American Economic Review, Vol. 89, No. 2, pp. 403-408. Evera, Stephen Van (2006), ‘The Bush Administration is Weak on Terror’, MIT Center For International Studies, pp. 1-7. Ek, Carl (2007), ‘NATO’s Prague Capabilities Commitment’, Congressional Research Service Report, Order Code: RS21659, pp. 1-6. Flanagan, Stephen J. (2005), ‘Sustaining U.S.-European Global Security Cooperation’, Strategic Forum, No. 217, pp. 1-6. Goldstein, Judith; Kahler, Miles; Keohane, Robert O.; Slaughter, Anne Marie (eds.) (2000), ‘Legalization and World Politics’, International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 385-399. Gallis, Paul (2005), ‘The NATO Summit at Prague, 2002’, Congressional Research Service Report, Order Code: RS21354, pp. 1-5. Hoffman, Bruce (1999), ‘Is Europe Soft on Terrorism?’, Foreign Policy, No.115, pp. 62-76. Hayes, Ben (2004), ‘From the Schengen Information System to SIS Ⅱ and the Visa Information (VIS): the proposals explained’, Statewatch analysis, pp. 3-45. Keohane, Robert O.; Martin Lisa (eds.) (1995), ‘The Promise of Institutionalist Theory’, International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 39-51. Knight, Charles; Murphy, Melissa; Mousseau, Michael (eds.) (2003), ‘The Sources of Terrorism’, International Security, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 192-198. Kuzmanov, Krassimir (2006), ‘Does NATO Have a Role in Fight Against International Terrorism: Analysis of NATO’s Response to September 11’, Information & Security, Vol. 19, pp. 61-84. Kydd, Andrew H.; Walter, Barbara F. (eds.) (2006), ‘The Strategies of Terrorism’, International Security, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 49-80. Katzman, Kenneth (2008), ‘The Iran Sanctions Act (ISA)’, Congressional Research Service Report, Order Code: RS20871, pp. 1-6. Lugna, Lauri (2006), ‘Institutional Framework of the European Union Counter-Terrorism Policy Setting’, Baltic Security&Defence Review, Vol.8, pp. 101-127. Mearsheimer, John J. (1994-1995), ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’, International Security, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 5-49. Mackarel, Mark; Nash, Susan (1997), ‘Extradition and the European Union’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 948-957. Nevers, Renee de (2007), ‘NATO’s International Security Role in the Terrorist Era’, International Security, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 34-66. Payne, Keith B. (2005), ‘Bush Administration Strategic Policy: A Reality Check’, The Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 775-787. Perl, Raphael (2005), ‘U.S. Anti-Terror Strategy and the 9/11 Commission Report’, Congressional Research Service Report, Order Code: RL32522, pp. 1-11. Ruggie, John Gerard (1995), ‘The False Premise of Realism’, International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 62-70. Roberts, Adam (2005), ‘The ‘war on Terror’ in historical perspective’, Survival, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 101-130. Rose, William; Murphy, Rysia; Abrahms, Max (eds.) (2007), ‘Does Terrorism Ever Work? The 2004 Madrid Train Bombings’, International Security, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 185-192. Smith, Michael E. (2004), ‘Institutionalization, Policy Adaptation and European Foreign Policy Cooperation’, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 95-136. Schmidt, John R. (2006-2007), ‘Last Alliance Standing? NATO after 9/11”, The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 93-106. Trager, Robert F.; Zagorcheva, Dessislava P. (eds.) (2006), ‘Deterring Terrorism: It could Be Done’, International Security, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 87-123. 參、歐盟與美國官方文件歐盟： 1995/73/JHA: Council Joint Action of 10 March 1995 concerning the Europol Drugs Unit (OJ L62, 20.3.1995). 1996/747/JHA: Council Joint Action of 29 November 1996 concerning the creation and maintenance of a directory of specialised competences, skills and expertise in the fight against international organised crime, in order to facilitate law enforcement cooperation between the Member States of the European Union (OJ L342, 31.12.1996). 2002/460/EC: COUNCIL DECISION of 17 June 2002 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2002/334/EC (OJ L160, 18.6.2002). 2002/462/CFSP: Council Common Position of 17 June 2002 updating Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism and repealing Common Position 2002/340/CFSP (OJ L160, 18.6.2002). 2002/475/JHA: Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L164, 22.6.2002). 2004/634/EC: Concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on intensifying and broadening the Agreement on customs cooperation and mutual assistance in customs matters to include cooperation on container security and related matters (OJ L304, 30.9.2004). 2005/930/EC: Council Decision of 21 December 2005 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2005/848/EC (OJ L340, 23.12.2005). 2007/551/CFSP/JHA: Council Decision on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of an Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data by air carriers to the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (2007 PNR Agreement) (OJ L204, 4.8.2007). Commission of the European Communities Communication from the Commission to the Council and the Parliament：Transfer of Air Passenger Name Record (PNR) Data：A Global EU Approach, Brussels, 16.12.2003, (COM(2003) 826 final). Commission Staff Working Paper：“An EC-U.S. Agreement on Passenger Name Record (PNR)”, Brussels, 21.1.2004, (SEC(2004) 81). Conclusions and Plan of Action of the Extraordinary European Council, Brussels, 21 September 2001, (SN140/01). Council of the European Union Declaration on Combating Terrorism, Brussels, 25 March 2004, (7906/04). Working Structures of the Council in terrorism matters, Brussels, 25 May 2004, (9791/04). EU Plan of Action on Combating Terrorism, Brussels, 29 November 2004, (14330/1/04 REV 1). The Hague Programme, Brussels, 13 December 2004, (16054/04). The European Union Counter-Terrorism Strategy, Brussels, 30 November 2005, (14469/4/05 REV 4). Europol Corporate Communications, 2006. Annual Report 2006. European Police Office, ( U0002-1601200915190300;
Veröffentlichung:	2009
Medientyp:	unknown
Schlagwort:	恐怖主義歐盟美國反恐合作國際政府間組織 Terrorism EU US Counter-Terrorism Cooperation Intergovernmental Organizations
Sonstiges:	Nachgewiesen in: BASE Sprachen: Chinese Collection: Tamkang University Institutional Repository (TKUIR) / 淡江大學機構典藏 Document Type: other/unknown material File Description: 143 bytes; application/octet-stream Language: Chinese

Klicken Sie ein Format an und speichern Sie dann die Daten oder geben Sie eine Empfänger-Adresse ein und lassen Sie sich per Email zusenden.

BibTeX Citavi, JabRef, u.a.
(Literaturverwaltung)

PDF kein Volltext!
(Merkzettel, Notizen)

RIS Endnote, Citavi u.a.
(Literaturverwaltung)

MODS
(XML zur Weiterverarbeitung)

oder

Wählen Sie das für Sie passende Zitationsformat und kopieren Sie es dann in die Zwischenablage, lassen es sich per Mail zusenden oder speichern es als PDF-Datei.

Gewünschter Zitations-Stil:

oder

Bitte prüfen Sie, ob die Zitation formal korrekt ist, bevor Sie sie in einer Arbeit verwenden. Benutzen Sie gegebenenfalls den "Exportieren"-Dialog, wenn Sie ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm verwenden und die Zitat-Angaben selbst formatieren wollen.