Jurisdicţia muncii. Sume încasate necuvenit de salariat. Prescripţia dreptului la acţiune. Începutul cursului prescripţiei. (Romanian)

The objection regarding the prescription of the material right to action was correctly admitted, the court ruling on the irrelevance of the fact that the prescription term started lapsing on the Court of Audit's findings date. The appellant's allegations regarding the interruption or suspension of the prescription term pursuant to its measures meant to obtain the cancellation of the control act are groundless, considering that this control body's act is erroneously indicated as the source of the prejudice, as the trigger of the claimed right. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

În mod corect a fost admisă excepţia prescripţiei dreptului material la acţiune, reţinându-se lipsa de relevanţă în privinţa curgerii prescripţiei a datei constatărilor Curţii de Conturi. Sunt neîntemeiate susţinerile apelantei privind întreruperea ori suspendarea cursului prescripţiei justificată de demersurile sale având ca scop anularea actului de control, de vreme ce acest act al organului de control este indicat în mod eronat ca sursă a prejudiciului, ca izvor al dreptului la a cărui realizare se tinde. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Romanian Case Law Review / Revista Română de Jurisprudenţă is the property of Universul Juridic Publishing House and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)