Studies from University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC) Further Understanding of Anesthesiology (Impact of gasless vNOTES vs. traditional vNOTES on hemodynamic profiles and outcomes in patients with benign gynecological...).

A new report from the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC) discusses the impact of gasless vNOTES (vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery) compared to traditional vNOTES on hemodynamic profiles and outcomes in patients with benign gynecological disease. The study aims to determine if gasless vNOTES is a safer and more effective treatment option. The research is a single-center, prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial that will recruit 120 patients who will be randomly assigned to either the traditional vNOTES group or the gasless vNOTES group. The primary outcome is vital signs at different time points, and secondary outcomes include surgical conversion rate, duration of surgery and anesthesia, anesthetic consumption, and postoperative complications. This study is the first randomized controlled trial to compare the impacts of gasless vNOTES and traditional vNOTES on hemodynamic profiles and outcomes in patients with benign gynecological disease. [Extracted from the article]

Copyright of Pain & Central Nervous System Week is the property of NewsRx and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)