СМІХ ЯК КОМУНІКАЦІЯ (В РЕЦЕПЦІЇ Ф. НІЦШЕ І А. БЕРГСОНА Ж. БАТАЄМ). (Ukrainian)

The article is devoted to the analysis of the concept of “laughter” in the philosophical ideas and literary works of the twentieth century French thinker, Georges Bataille. Laughter appears as a philosophical-theoretical instruction, a method of subversive experience and critique of the previous philosophical tradition, self-analysis through one’s own text and metaphors (philosophical, artistic and life). Particular attention is paid to the influence of ideas about laughter by Henri Bergson and Friedrich Nietzsche on the formation in the texts by Bataille of the war period included in the Summa Atheologica cycle, a comprehensive perception of laughter as a practice, intellectual setting, metaphor and means of de-subjectivization. If Nietzsche is a guide and an accurate appeal in communication and community formation, then the ideas of Bergson (the sociological concept of laughter) are the subject of challenging and criticism. In the works of Nietzsche Bataille interprets laughter as a conscious gesture of the sovereign formation of a man, although Bataille himself deprives laughter of the characteristics of consciousness, but instead in laughter reveals the possibility of breaking the subject with himself and, consequently, communication with others. The fundamental characteristics of Bataille’s laughter are communication (formation of an extra-subjective community), eroticism (building an analogy with erotic desire and ecstasy), appeal to the impossible, non-knowledge, nothing, loss of the self (abandonment of I), distinction with humor and intellectual laughter. Another key concept in Bataille’s philosophy of laughter – “glissement” – is noted, as time to time it is used by the thinker to combine and cross all metaphors (laughter, religious and erotic experiences with the component of liquids), and to identify these meanings in the very form of one’s own writing. The development of the tradition of philosophical deconstruction (Nietzsche – Bataille – Foucault, Deleuze, Cixous) is traced, within the framework of which the specific experience of reading a text penetrated by laughter as an attitude is considered.The article is devoted to the analysis of the concept of “laughter” in the philosophical ideas and literary works of the twentieth century French thinker, Georges Bataille. Laughter appears as a philosophical-theoretical instruction, a method of subversive experience and critique of the previous philosophical tradition, self-analysis through one’s own text and metaphors (philosophical, artistic and life). Particular attention is paid to the influence of ideas about laughter by Henri Bergson and Friedrich Nietzsche on the formation in the texts by Bataille of the war period included in the Summa Atheologica cycle, a comprehensive perception of laughter as a practice, intellectual setting, metaphor and means of de-subjectivization. If Nietzsche is a guide and an accurate appeal in communication and community formation, then the ideas of Bergson (the sociological concept of laughter) are the subject of challenging and criticism. In the works of Nietzsche Bataille interprets laughter as a conscious gesture of the sovereign formation of a man, although Bataille himself deprives laughter of the characteristics of consciousness, but instead in laughter reveals the possibility of breaking the subject with himself and, consequently, communication with others. The fundamental characteristics of Bataille’s laughter are communication (formation of an extra-subjective community), eroticism (building an analogy with erotic desire and ecstasy), appeal to the impossible, non-knowledge, nothing, loss of the self (abandonment of I), distinction with humor and intellectual laughter. Another key concept in Bataille’s philosophy of laughter – “glissement” – is noted, as time to time it is used by the thinker to combine and cross all metaphors (laughter, religious and erotic experiences with the component of liquids), and to identify these meanings in the very form of one’s own writing. The development of the tradition of philosophical deconstruction (Nietzsche – Bataille – Foucault, Deleuze, Cixous) is traced, within the framework of which the specific experience of reading a text penetrated by laughter as an attitude is considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Статья посвящена анализу концепта «смех» в философских идеях и литературных произведениях французского мыслителя ХХ века Жоржа Батая. Особое внимание обращено на влияние идей касемо смеха Анри Бергсона и Фридриха Ницше на формирование в текстах Батая военного периода, вошедших в цикл «Summa Atheologica», комплексного восприятия смеха как практики, интеллектуальной установки, метафоры и средства де-субъективизации. В качестве фундаментальных характеристик смеха Батая выделены коммуникация (формирование внесубьективного сообщества), эротизм (выстраивание аналогии с эротическим желанием и экстазом), обращение к невозможному, незнанию, ничто, саморастрате (отказ от собственного я), различие с юмором и интеллектуальным смехом. Прослежено выстраивание традиции философской деконструкции (Ницше – Батай – Фуко, Делез, Сиксу), в рамках которой рассматривается специфический опыт чтения текста, пронизанного смехом как установкой. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Doxa / Doksa is the property of I. I. Mechnikov Odessa National University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)