Einzeltreffer — DigiBib

Background and Aims: E-cigarette and other electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use has grown considerably over the past decade, with notable increases among young people. US state policy contexts for ENDS and tobacco may shape initiation into ENDS use among adolescents as they age into early adulthood. We aimed to determine whether state-level comprehensive vaping ban policies reduce the odds of youth initiation into ENDS use, net of additional state-level ENDS and tobacco policies, as well as the youth's cigarette smoking status.

Design: Longitudinal data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study were merged with a state-year database on tobacco and ENDS policies. Multivariable discrete-time event history models of ENDS initiation were estimated.

Setting: United States.

Participants: Twenty thousand twelve youth assessed over six waves from 2013 to 2019 (n = 53 974 observations).

Measurement: We examined comprehensive indoor vaping bans (i.e. 100% vape-free workplaces, restaurants and bars) as a key factor in initiation into ENDS use (i.e. first instance of vaping) from age 13 to 22.

Findings: Among young people, residing in a state with a comprehensive vaping ban was associated with 18% lower odds of ENDS initiation (odds ratio = 0.82; 95% confidence interval =[0.71, 0.94]), even after controlling for other state ENDS and tobacco policies, the youth's cigarette smoking and socio-demographic background and state-level covariates.

Conclusions: In the United States, state-level vaping bans (i.e. 100% vape-free workplaces, restaurants and bars) are associated with reduced odds of youth initiation into electronic nicotine delivery systems use.

Titel:	Comprehensive vaping bans are associated with lower odds of initiation into electronic nicotine delivery systems use among young people.
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person:	Vuolo, M ; Orsini, MM ; Staff, J ; Maggs, JL ; Kelly, BC
Link:	Zum Volltext
Zeitschrift:	Addiction (Abingdon, England), Jg. 119 (2024-06-01), Heft 6, S. 1037-1047
Veröffentlichung:	Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell ; <i>Original Publication</i>: Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK : Carfax Pub. Co., c1993-, 2024
Medientyp:	academicJournal
ISSN:	1360-0443 (electronic)
DOI:	10.1111/add.16450
Schlagwort:	Humans Adolescent Male Female United States epidemiology Longitudinal Studies Young Adult Restaurants legislation & jurisprudence Cigarette Smoking epidemiology Vaping epidemiology Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems statistics & numerical data
Sonstiges:	Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE Sprachen: English Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Language: English [Addiction] 2024 Jun; Vol. 119 (6), pp. 1037-1047. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2024 Feb 27. MeSH Terms: Vaping* / epidemiology ; Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems* / statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Adolescent ; Male ; Female ; United States / epidemiology ; Longitudinal Studies ; Young Adult ; Restaurants / legislation & jurisprudence ; Cigarette Smoking / epidemiology References: Glantz SA, Bareham DW. E‐cigarettes: use, effects on smoking, risks, and policy implications. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39(1):215–235. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013757. ; Cullen KA, Gentzke AS, Sawdey MD, Chang JT, Anic GM, Wang TW, et al. E‐cigarette use among youth in the United States, 2019. JAMA. 2019 Dec 3;322(21):2095–2103. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.18387. ; Kasza KA, Edwards KC, Tang Z, Stanton CA, Sharma E, Halenar MJ, et al. Correlates of tobacco product initiation among youth and adults in the USA: findings from the PATH study waves 1–3 (2013–2016). Tob Control. 2020;29(Suppl 3):s191–s202. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055671. ; Everett SA, Warren CW, Sharp D, Kann L, Husten CG, Crossett LS. Initiation of cigarette smoking and subsequent smoking behavior among U.S. high school students. PrevMed. 1999 Nov 1;29(5):327–333. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1999.0560. ; Barrington‐Trimis JL, Urman R, Berhane K, Unger JB, Cruz TB, Pentz MA, et al. E‐cigarettes and future cigarette use. Pediatrics. 2016 Jul 1;138(1):e20160379. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-0379. ; Primack BA, Soneji S, Stoolmiller M, Fine MJ, Sargent JD. Progression to traditional cigarette smoking after electronic cigarette use among US adolescents and young adults. JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Nov 1;169(11):1018–1023. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1742. ; Staff J, Kelly BC, Maggs JL, Vuolo M. Adolescent electronic cigarette use and tobacco smoking in the Millennium Cohort Study. Addiction. 2022;117(2):484–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15645. ; Jayakumar N, O'Connor S, Diemert L, Schwartz R. Predictors of e‐cigarette initiation: findings from the youth and young adult panel study. Tob Use Insights. 2020;13:1179173X20977486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X20977486. ; Loukas A, Paddock EM, Li X, Harrell MB, Pasch KE, Perry CL. Electronic nicotine delivery systems marketing and initiation among youth and young adults. Pediatrics. 2019;144(3):e20183601. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-3601. ; Evans‐Polce R, Veliz P, Boyd CJ, McCabe VV, McCabe SE. Trends in e‐cigarette, cigarette, cigar, and smokeless tobacco use among US adolescent cohorts, 2014–2018. Am J Public Health. 2020 Feb;110(2):163–165. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305421. ; Pérez A, Bluestein MA, Kuk AE, Chen B. Age of e‐cigarette initiation in USA young adults: findings from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study (2013–2017). PLoS ONE. 2021;16(12):e0261243. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261243. ; Titus AR, Kalousova L, Meza R, Levy DT, Thrasher JF, Elliott MR, et al. Smoke‐free policies and smoking cessation in the United States, 2003–2015. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep;16(17):3200. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16173200. ; Vuolo M, Kadowaki J, Kelly BC. A multilevel test of constrained choices theory: the case of tobacco clean air restrictions. J Health Soc Behav. 2016 Sep;57(3):351–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146516653790. ; Song AV, Dutra LM, Neilands TB, Glantz SA. Association of smoke‐free laws with lower percentages of new and current smokers among adolescents and young adults: an 11‐year longitudinal study. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(9):e152285. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2285. ; Parks MJ, Kingsbury JH, Boyle RG, Choi K. Behavioral change in response to a statewide tobacco tax increase and differences across socioeconomic status. Addict Behav. 2017;73:209–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.019. ; Mojtabai R, Riehm KE, Cohen JE, Alexander GC, Rutkow L. Clean indoor air laws, cigarette excise taxes, and smoking: results from the current population survey‐tobacco use supplement, 2003–2011. Prev Med. 2019 Sep 1;126:105744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.06.002. ; International Agency for Research on Cancer. Evaluating the effectiveness of smoke‐free policies. Handbooks of cancer prevention, tobacco control Lyon, France: IARC; 2009. ; Brown T, Platt S, Amos A. Equity impact of interventions and policies to reduce smoking in youth: systematic review. Tob Control. 2014 Nov 1;23(e2):e98–e105. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051451. ; Cotti C, Courtemanche C, Maclean JC, Nesson E, Pesko MF, Tefft NW. The effects of e‐cigarette taxes on e‐cigarette prices and tobacco product sales: evidence from retail panel data. J Health Econ. 2022;86:102676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2022.102676. ; Kadowaki J, Vuolo M, Kelly BC. A review of the current geographic distribution of and debate surrounding electronic cigarette clean air regulations in the United States. Health Place. 2015 Jan 1;31:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.11.003. ; Wackowski OA, Delnevo CD. Smokers' attitudes and support for e‐cigarette policies and regulation in the USA. Tob Control. 2015 Nov 1;24(6):543–546. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051953. ; Friedman AS, Pesko MF. Young adult responses to taxes on cigarettes and electronic nicotine delivery systems. Addiction. 2022 Dec;117(12):3121–3128. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16002. ; Kelly BC, Vuolo M, Frizzell LC, Hernandez EM. Denormalization, smoke‐free air policy, and tobacco use among young adults. Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug 1;211:70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.051. ; Friedman AS, Oliver JF, Busch SH. Adding vaping restrictions to smoke‐free air laws: associations with conventional and electronic cigarette use. Addiction. 2021 Aug;116(8):2198–2206. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15434. ; Cheng KW, Liu F, Pesko MF, Levy DT, Fong GT, Cummings KM. Impact of vaping restrictions in public places on smoking and vaping in the United States—evidence using a difference‐in‐differences approach. Addiction. 2023 Jan;118(1):160–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16039. ; Yang M, Russell A, Lin HC. Association between inclusion of E‐cigarettes in statewide comprehensive smoke‐free indoor air laws and vaping behaviors: results from a longitudinal population study. Subst Use Misuse. 2022 Apr 16;57(5):806–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2022.2046091. ; Piesse A, Opsomer J, Dohrmann S, DiGaetano R, Morganstein D, Taylor K, et al. Longitudinal uses of the population assessment of tobacco and health study. Tob Reg Sci. 2021 Jan;7(1):3–16. https://doi.org/10.18001/TRS.7.1.1. ; Cotti C, Nesson E, Pesko MF, Phillips S, Tefft N. Standardising the measurement of e‐cigarette taxes in the USA, 2010–2020. Tob Control. 2023;32(e2):e251–e254. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056865. ; Allison, PD. Event history analysis: regression for longitudinal event data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1984, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984195. ; Scharfstein DO, Rotnitzky A, Robins JM. Adjusting for nonignorable drop‐out using semiparametric nonresponse models. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94(448):1096–1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10473862. ; Cooper M, Park‐Lee E, Ren C, Cornelius M, Jamal A, Cullen KA. Notes from the field: E‐cigarette use among middle and high school students—United States, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(40):1283–1285. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7140a3. ; Cohen JE, Krishnan‐Sarin S, Eissenberg T, Gould TJ, Berman ML, Bhatnagar A, et al. Balancing risks and benefits of e‐cigarettes in the real world. Am J Public Health. 2022 Feb;112(2):e1–e2. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306607. ; Kelly BC, Vuolo M, Orsini MM, Maggs JL, Staff J. Tobacco policy and ENDS policy influences on adolescent vaping across the U.S. states. Am J Prevent Med. 2023;65(6):1026–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2023.07.010. ; National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US) Office on Smoking and Health. E‐cigarette use among youth and young adults. A report of the surgeon general Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2016. ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2023. Smokefree indoor air laws, including E‐cigarettes. https://www.cdc.gov/statesystem/factsheets/ecigarette/EcigSFIA.html. Accessed 15 Dec 2023. Grant Information: R01DA054234 United States DA NIDA NIH HHS; R01DA054234 United States DA NIDA NIH HHS Contributed Indexing: Keywords: ENDS; e‐cigarettes; initiation; policy; vaping bans; youth Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20240227 Date Completed: 20240506 Latest Revision: 20240506 Update Code: 20240507

Klicken Sie ein Format an und speichern Sie dann die Daten oder geben Sie eine Empfänger-Adresse ein und lassen Sie sich per Email zusenden.

BibTeX Citavi, JabRef, u.a.
(Literaturverwaltung)

PDF kein Volltext!
(Merkzettel, Notizen)

RIS Endnote, Citavi u.a.
(Literaturverwaltung)

MODS
(XML zur Weiterverarbeitung)

oder

Wählen Sie das für Sie passende Zitationsformat und kopieren Sie es dann in die Zwischenablage, lassen es sich per Mail zusenden oder speichern es als PDF-Datei.

Gewünschter Zitations-Stil:

oder

Bitte prüfen Sie, ob die Zitation formal korrekt ist, bevor Sie sie in einer Arbeit verwenden. Benutzen Sie gegebenenfalls den "Exportieren"-Dialog, wenn Sie ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm verwenden und die Zitat-Angaben selbst formatieren wollen.

Comprehensive vaping bans are associated with lower odds of initiation into electronic nicotine delivery systems use among young people.