Aquablation in Patients on Antithrombotics: Assessment of Safety, Postoperative Bleeding Rates and Clinical Outcomes.

Objective: To analyze the impact of perioperative antithrombotic use on the bleeding outcomes following Aquablation.

Methods: One hundred sixteen men with who underwent Aquablation as part of the WATER prospective trial (NCT02505919) were assigned to 2 groups based on perioperative antithrombotic status. Antithrombotic cessation and restart timing were based on the surgeon's discretion. Methods of achieving intraoperative hemostasis consisted of no-cautery balloon tamponade or cautery. Primary endpoints included immediate postoperative hematuria rates and changes in hemoglobin. Secondary endpoints included 90-day bleeding complications and nonbleeding postoperative adverse events.

Results: Forty-one men took antithrombotic medications in the perioperative period while 75 men had no antithrombotic medication. Preoperative hemoglobin levels were comparable between both groups. Postoperative hemoglobin change from baseline (drop of 1.8 ± 1.5 g/dL among the antithrombotic group vs 1.8 ± 1.7 g/dL among the antithrombotic-naïve group) did not differ between both groups (P = .896). In total, 4 (9.8%) men in the antithrombotic group and 4 (5.3%) patients in the antithrombotic-naïve group experienced a Clavien-Dindo grade 1 complication (P = .451) in the 3-month postoperative period. Eight (19.5%) patients in the antithrombotic group and 11 (14.7%) patients in the antithrombotic-naïve group experienced a Clavien-Dindo grade 2 complication (P = .601), none of which is associated with bleeding in both groups. No men in either group demonstrated de novo erectile dysfunction. One patient (2.4%) in the antithrombotic group and none in the antithrombotic-naïve group required blood products (P = .353).

Conclusion: Aquablation demonstrates comparable postoperative bleeding outcomes and other adverse effects for men with benign prostatic hypertrophy who are on antithrombotic therapy.

Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Neil Barber – Proctor/Advisor to Procept Biorobotics. Kussil Oumedjbeur -- consulting agreement with Procept-BioRobotics for travel expenses. Naeem Bhojani Received paid training session at the AUA 2018. Dean Elterman Paid consultant to Procept Biorobotics. Alexis E. Te Paid consultant to Procept Biorobotics. Claus Roehrborn Paid consultant to Procept Biorobotics. Kevin Zorn Paid consultant to Procept Biorobotics/Received paid training session at the AUA 2018. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

(Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)