Einzeltreffer — DigiBib

It is crucial to understand why people comply with measures to contain viruses and their effects during pandemics. We provide evidence from 35 countries (N total = 12,553) from 6 continents during the COVID-19 pandemic (between 2021 and 2022) obtained via cross-sectional surveys that the social perception of key protagonists on two basic dimensions-warmth and competence-plays a crucial role in shaping pandemic-related behaviors. Firstly, when asked in an open question format, heads of state, physicians, and protest movements were universally identified as key protagonists across countries. Secondly, multiple-group confirmatory factor analyses revealed that warmth and competence perceptions of these and other protagonists differed significantly within and between countries. Thirdly, internal meta-analyses showed that warmth and competence perceptions of heads of state, physicians, and protest movements were associated with support and opposition intentions, containment and prevention behaviors, as well as vaccination uptake. Our results have important implications for designing effective interventions to motivate desirable health outcomes and coping with future health crises and other global challenges.

Titel:	Warmth and competence perceptions of key protagonists are associated with containment measures during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from 35 countries.
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person:	Friehs, MT ; Kotzur, PF ; Kraus, C ; Schemmerling, M ; Herzig, JA ; Stanciu, A ; Dilly, S ; Hellert, L ; Hübner, D ; Rückwardt, A ; Ulizcay, V ; Christ, O ; Brambilla, M ; De Keersmaecker, J ; Durante, F ; Gale, J ; Grigoryev, D ; Igou, ER ; Javakhishvili, N ; Kienmoser, D ; Nicolas, G ; Oldmeadow, J ; Rohmer, O ; Sætrevik, B ; Barbedor, J ; Bastias, F ; Bjørkheim, SB ; Bolatov, A ; Duran, N ; Findor, A ; Götz, F ; Graf, S ; Hakobjanyan, A ; Halkias, G ; Hancheva, C ; Hřebíčková, M ; Hruška, M ; Husnu, S ; Kadirov, K ; Khachatryan, N ; Macedo, FG ; Makashvili, A ; Martínez-Muñoz, M ; Mercadante, E ; Mesesan Schmitz, L ; Michael, A ; Mullabaeva, N ; Neto, F ; Neto, J ; Ozturk, M ; Paschenko, S ; Pietraszkiewicz, A ; Psaltis, C ; Qiu, Y ; Rupar, M ; Samekin, A ; Schmid, K ; Sczesny, S ; Sun, Y ; Svedholm-Häkkinen, AM ; Szymkow, A ; Teye-Kwadjo, E ; Torres, CV ; Vieira, L ; Yahiiaiev, I ; Yzerbyt, V
Link:	Zum Volltext
Zeitschrift:	Scientific reports, Jg. 12 (2022-12-08), Heft 1, S. 21277
Veröffentlichung:	London : Nature Publishing Group, copyright 2011-, 2022
Medientyp:	academicJournal
ISSN:	2045-2322 (electronic)
DOI:	10.1038/s41598-022-25228-9
Schlagwort:	Humans Cross-Sectional Studies Pandemics prevention & control COVID-19 epidemiology COVID-19 prevention & control
Sonstiges:	Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE Sprachen: English Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Language: English [Sci Rep] 2022 Dec 08; Vol. 12 (1), pp. 21277. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2022 Dec 08. MeSH Terms: COVID-19* / epidemiology ; COVID-19* / prevention & control ; Humans ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Pandemics / prevention & control Comments: Erratum in: Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 12;13(1):648. (PMID: 36635410) References: Davies, S. Pandemics and the consequences of COVID-19. Econ. Aff. 40, 131–137 (2020). (PMID: 10.1111/ecaf.12415) ; Mathieu, E. et al. A global database of COVID-19 vaccinations. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 947–953 (2021). (PMID: 10.1038/s41562-021-01122-8) ; Douglas, K. M. COVID-19 conspiracy theories. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 24, 270–275 (2021). (PMID: 10.1177/1368430220982068) ; Søraa, R. A. et al. Othering and deprioritizing older adults’ lives: Ageist discourses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur. J. Psychol. 16, 532–541 (2020). (PMID: 10.5964/ejop.v16i4.4127) ; Khan, M. L., Malik, A., Ruhi, U. & Al-Busaidi, A. Conflicting attitudes: Analyzing social media data to understand the early discourse on COVID-19 passports. Technol. Soc. 68, 101830 (2022). (PMID: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101830) ; Pascual-Ferrá, P., Alperstein, N., Barnett, D. J. & Rimal, R. N. Toxicity and verbal aggression on social media: Polarized discourse on wearing face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Big Data Soc. 8, 205395172110235 (2021). (PMID: 10.1177/20539517211023533) ; Burke, P. F., Masters, D. & Massey, G. Enablers and barriers to COVID-19 vaccine uptake: An international study of perceptions and intentions. Vaccine 39, 5116–5128 (2021). (PMID: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.07.056) ; Dong, G. et al. Self-interest bias in the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-cultural comparison between the United States and China. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 52, 663–679 (2021). (PMID: 10.1177/00220221211025739) ; Enea, V. et al. Intentions to be vaccinated against COVID-19: The role of prosociality and conspiracy beliefs across 20 countries. Health Commun. 0, 1–10 (2022). (PMID: 10.1080/10410236.2021.2018179) ; Pagliaro, S. et al. Trust predicts COVID-19 prescribed and discretionary behavioral intentions in 23 countries. PLoS ONE 16, e0248334 (2021). (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248334) ; Romano, A. et al. Cooperation and trust across societies during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 52, 622–642 (2021). (PMID: 10.1177/0022022120988913) ; Schumpe, B. M. et al. Predictors of adherence to public health behaviors for fighting COVID-19 derived from longitudinal data. Sci. Rep. 12, 3824 (2022). (PMID: 10.1038/s41598-021-04703-9) ; Van Bavel, J. J. et al. National identity predicts public health support during a global pandemic. Nat. Commun. 13, 517 (2022). (PMID: 10.1038/s41467-021-27668-9) ; Zhu, N., Smetana, J. G. & Chang, L. Acceptance of society-level and individual-level preventive measures during the COVID-19 pandemic among college students in three societies. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 52, 606–621 (2021). (PMID: 10.1177/0022022121995971) ; Visintin, E. P. Contact with older people, ageism, and containment behaviours during the COVID -19 pandemic. J. Commu. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 31, 314–325 (2021). (PMID: 10.1002/casp.2504) ; Alston, L., Meleady, R. & Seger, C. R. Can past intergroup contact shape support for policies in a pandemic? Processes predicting endorsement of discriminatory Chinese restrictions during the COVID-19 crisis. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 25, 122–132 (2022). (PMID: 10.1177/1368430220959710) ; Ahluwalia, S. C., Edelen, M. O., Qureshi, N. & Etchegaray, J. M. Trust in experts, not trust in national leadership, leads to greater uptake of recommended actions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy 12, 283–302 (2021). (PMID: 10.1002/rhc3.12219) ; Siegrist, M., Earle, T. C. & Gutscher, H. Test of a trust and confidence model in the applied context of electromagnetic field (EMF) risks. Risk Anal. 23, 705–716 (2003). (PMID: 10.1111/1539-6924.00349) ; Wynen, J. et al. Taking a COVID-19 vaccine or not? Do trust in government and trust in experts help us to understand vaccination intention? Adm. Soc. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211073459 (2022). (PMID: 10.1177/00953997211073459) ; Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P. & Xu, J. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82, 878–902 (2002). (PMID: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878) ; Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T. & Glick, P. The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 92, 631–648 (2007). (PMID: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631) ; Abele, A. E., Ellemers, N., Fiske, S. T., Koch, A. & Yzerbyt, V. Navigating the social world: Toward an integrated framework for evaluating self, individuals, and groups. Psychol. Rev. 128, 290–314 (2021). (PMID: 10.1037/rev0000262) ; Froehlich, L. & Schulte, I. Warmth and competence stereotypes about immigrant groups in Germany. PLoS ONE 14, e0223103 (2019). (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223103) ; Kotzur, P. F., Friehs, M.-T., Asbrock, F. & van Zalk, M. H. W. Stereotype content of refugee subgroups in Germany. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 49, 1344–1358 (2019). (PMID: 10.1002/ejsp.2585) ; Friehs, M. T., Aparicio-Lukassowitz, F. & Wagner, U. Stereotype content of occupational groups in Germany. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 52, 459–475 (2022). (PMID: 10.1111/jasp.12872) ; He, J. C., Kang, S. K., Tse, K. & Toh, S. M. Stereotypes at work: Occupational stereotypes predict race and gender segregation in the workforce. J. Vocat. Behav. 115, 103318 (2019). (PMID: 10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103318) ; Kervyn, N., Chan, E., Malone, C., Korpusik, A. & Ybarra, O. Not all disasters are equal in the public’s eye: The negativity effect on warmth in brand perception. Soc. Cogn. 32, 256–275 (2014). (PMID: 10.1521/soco.2014.32.3.256) ; Fiske, S. T., Nicolas, G. & Bai, X. The stereotype content model: How we make sense of individuals and groups. In Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles 3rd edn (eds Van Lange, P. A. M. et al.) 392–410 (The Guilford Press, 2021). ; Sevillano, V. & Fiske, S. T. Stereotypes, emotions, and behaviors associated with animals: A causal test of the stereotype content model and BIAS map. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 22, 879–900 (2019). (PMID: 10.1177/1368430219851560) ; Bick, N., Froehlich, L., Friehs, M.-T., Kotzur, P. F., & Landmann, H. Social evaluation at a distance - Facets of stereotype content about student groups in higher distance education. Int. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 35, 12 (2022). ; Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Organizational Identity: A Reader (eds Hatch, M. J. & Schultz, M.) 56–65 (Oxford University Press, 1979). ; Koch, A. et al. Groups’ warmth is a personal matter: Understanding consensus on stereotype dimensions reconciles adversarial models of social evaluation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 89, 103995 (2020). (PMID: 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103995) ; Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory (Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1986). ; Zaccaro, S. J., Blair, V., Peterson, C. & Zazanis, M. Collective efficacy. In Self-efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment (ed. Maddux, J. E.) 305–330 (Springer, 1995). (PMID: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6868-5_11) ; Lee, K., Worsnop, C. Z., Grépin, K. A. & Kamradt-Scott, A. Global coordination on cross-border travel and trade measures crucial to COVID-19 response. Lancet 395, 1593–1595 (2020). (PMID: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31032-1) ; Miskulin, M. et al. Vaccination attitudes and experiences of medical doctors in Croatia amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A social roles conflict? Vaccines 10, 399 (2022). (PMID: 10.3390/vaccines10030399) ; Young, M., Marotta, R., Lee, I., Phan, J. & Jacobs, R. J. Differences in attitudes of front-line clinicians, healthcare workers, and non-healthcare workers toward COVID-19 safety protocols. Cureus 14, e20936 (2022). ; Ullah, I., Khan, K. S., Tahir, M. J., Ahmed, A. & Harapan, H. Myths and conspiracy theories on vaccines and COVID-19: Potential effect on global vaccine refusals. Vacunas 22, 93–97 (2021). (PMID: 10.1016/j.vacun.2021.01.001) ; Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., Lohmann, S. & Albarracín, D. The influence of attitudes on behavior. In The Handbook of Attitudes (eds Albarracín, D. et al.) 173–221 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2005). ; Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 6, 466–487 (1970). (PMID: 10.1016/0022-1031(70)90057-0) ; Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychol. Bull. 84, 888–918 (1977). (PMID: 10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888) ; Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based behavioral science. Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 111–135 (2010). (PMID: 10.1017/S0140525X10000725) ; Brunswik, E. Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychol. Rev. 62, 193–217 (1955). (PMID: 10.1037/h0047470) ; Brunswik, E. Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments (University of California Press, 1956). (PMID: 10.1525/9780520350519) ; Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 21, 495–508 (2014). (PMID: 10.1080/10705511.2014.919210) ; Lasco, G. Medical populism and the COVID-19 pandemic. Glob. Public Health 15, 1417–1429 (2020). (PMID: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1807581) ; Wagner, U., Friehs, M.-T. & Kotzur, P. F. Das Bild der Polizei bei jungen Studierenden [The image of the police in the eyes of German students]. Poliz. Wiss. 3, 16–23 (2020). ; Southwell, P. L. The effect of political alienation on voter turnout, 1964–2000. J. Polit. Mil. Sociol. 36, 131–145 (2008). ; Stoker, G. & Evans, M. The, “democracy-politics paradox”: The dynamics of political alienation. Democr. Theory 1, 26–36 (2014). (PMID: 10.3167/dt.2014.010203) ; Bartusevičius, H., Bor, A., Jørgensen, F. & Petersen, M. B. The psychological burden of the COVID-19 pandemic is associated with antisystemic attitudes and political violence. Psychol. Sci. 32, 1391–1403 (2021). (PMID: 10.1177/09567976211031847) ; Timoshenkova, E. P. Angela Merkel’s leadership lessons: The secret of political longevity (2013–2021). Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 92, S119–S125 (2022). (PMID: 10.1134/S1019331622080111) ; Day, G., Robert, G., Leedham-Green, K. & Rafferty, A. M. An outbreak of appreciation: A discursive analysis of tweets of gratitude expressed to the National Health Service at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Expect. 25, 149–162 (2022). (PMID: 10.1111/hex.13359) ; Garcia, L. P. Gratidão ao sistema único de saúde do Brasil. Epidemiol. E Serviços Saúde 29, e2020333 (2020). (PMID: 10.1590/s1679-49742020000500024) ; Rahaman, Md. S., Rahman, Md. M., Ali Reza, S. M., Reza, M. N. & Chowdhury, Md. S. Thank you, COVID-19: Positive social psychology towards the new normal. J. Public Aff. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2766 (2021). (PMID: 10.1002/pa.2766) ; Yun, E. K., Kim, J. O., Byun, H. M. & Lee, G. G. Topic modeling and keyword network analysis of news articles related to nurses before and after "the Thanks to You Challenge" during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Korean Acad. Nurs. 51, 442–453 (2021). (PMID: 10.4040/jkan.20287) ; Festinger, L. Informal social communication. Psychol. Rev. 57, 271–282 (1950). (PMID: 10.1037/h0056932) ; Festinger, L. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum. Relat. 7, 117–140 (1954). (PMID: 10.1177/001872675400700202) ; Cornwell, J. F. M., Bajger, A. T. & Higgins, E. T. Judging political hearts and minds: How political dynamics drive social judgments. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 41, 1053–1068 (2015). (PMID: 10.1177/0146167215589720) ; Friehs, M.-T. et al. Examining the structural validity of stereotype content scales: A preregistered re-analysis of published data and discussion of possible future directions. Int. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 35, 1–18 (2022). (PMID: 10.5334/irsp.613) ; Bunge, E. M. et al. The changing epidemiology of human monkeypox: A potential threat? A systematic review. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 16, e0010141 (2022). (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010141) ; Raju, E., Boyd, E. & Otto, F. Stop blaming the climate for disasters. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 1–2 (2022). (PMID: 10.1038/s43247-021-00332-2) ; Lichterman, A. The peace movement and the Ukraine war: Where to now? J. Peace Nucl. Disarm. 5, 185–197 (2022). (PMID: 10.1080/25751654.2022.2060634) ; Fiske, S. T. & North, M. S. Measures of stereotyping and prejudice. In Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs (eds Boyle, G. J. et al.) 684–718 (Academic Press, 2015). (PMID: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386915-9.00024-3) ; Harkness, J. Questionnaire translation. In Cross-Cultural Survey Methods (eds Harkness, J. et al.) 35–36 (Wiley, 2003). ; Kotzur, P. F. et al. ‘Society thinks they are cold and/or incompetent, but I do not’: Stereotype content ratings depend on instructions and the social group’s location in the stereotype content space. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 59, 1018–1042 (2020). (PMID: 10.1111/bjso.12375) ; GESIS Panel Team. GESIS panel special survey on the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in Germany, ZA5667 Datenfile Version 1.1.0. GESIS Datenarchiv https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13520 (2020). (PMID: 10.4232/1.13520) ; Enders, C. K. & Bandalos, D. L. The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 8, 430–457 (2001). (PMID: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5) ; Brislin, R. W. Comparative research methodology: Cross-cultural studies. Int. J. Psychol. 11, 215–229 (1976). (PMID: 10.1080/00207597608247359) ; Goh, J. X., Hall, J. A. & Rosenthal, R. Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 10, 535–549 (2016). (PMID: 10.1111/spc3.12267) ; Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 2nd edn. (Erlbaum, 1988). Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20221209 Date Completed: 20221223 Latest Revision: 20230117 Update Code: 20231215 PubMed Central ID: PMC9732048

Klicken Sie ein Format an und speichern Sie dann die Daten oder geben Sie eine Empfänger-Adresse ein und lassen Sie sich per Email zusenden.

BibTeX Citavi, JabRef, u.a.
(Literaturverwaltung)

PDF kein Volltext!
(Merkzettel, Notizen)

RIS Endnote, Citavi u.a.
(Literaturverwaltung)

MODS
(XML zur Weiterverarbeitung)

oder

Wählen Sie das für Sie passende Zitationsformat und kopieren Sie es dann in die Zwischenablage, lassen es sich per Mail zusenden oder speichern es als PDF-Datei.

Gewünschter Zitations-Stil:

oder

Bitte prüfen Sie, ob die Zitation formal korrekt ist, bevor Sie sie in einer Arbeit verwenden. Benutzen Sie gegebenenfalls den "Exportieren"-Dialog, wenn Sie ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm verwenden und die Zitat-Angaben selbst formatieren wollen.

Warmth and competence perceptions of key protagonists are associated with containment measures during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from 35 countries.