| Sonstiges: |
- Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE
- Sprachen: English
- Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Language: English
- [Nat Commun] 2022 Dec 06; Vol. 13 (1), pp. 7511. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2022 Dec 06.
- MeSH Terms: COVID-19 Vaccines* ; COVID-19* / epidemiology ; COVID-19* / prevention & control ; Humans ; Vaccination ; Seasons ; Pandemics / prevention & control
- References: Global Change Data Lab. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Vaccinations. Our world in data https://ourworldindata.org/ (2022). ; Rees, F. et al. Measuring parents’ readiness to vaccinate themselves and their children against COVID-19. Vaccine 40, 3825–3834 (2022). (PMID: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.091) ; Lindholt, M. F., Jørgensen, F., Bor, A. & Petersen, M. B. Public acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines: cross-national evidence on levels and individual-level predictors using observational data. BMJ Open 11, 048172 (2021). (PMID: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048172) ; Neely, S. R., Eldredge, C., Ersing, R. & Remington, C. Vaccine Hesitancy and Exposure to Misinformation: a Survey Analysis. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 37, 179–187 (2022). (PMID: 10.1007/s11606-021-07171-z) ; Honora, A., Wang, K.-Y. & Chih, W.-H. How does information overload about COVID-19 vaccines influence individuals’ vaccination intentions? The roles of cyberchondria, perceived risk, and vaccine skepticism. Computers Hum. Behav. 130, 107176 (2022). (PMID: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107176) ; Zarocostas, J. How to fight an infodemic. Lancet 395, 676 (2020). (PMID: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30461-X) ; Hertwig, R. & Wulff, D. U. A description–experience framework of the psychology of risk. Perspect. psychological Sci. 17, 631–651 (2022). (PMID: 10.1177/17456916211026896) ; Sprengholz, P. & Betsch, C. Previous SARS‐CoV‐2 infection is linked to lower vaccination intentions. J. Med. Virol. 93, 6456–6457 (2021). (PMID: 10.1002/jmv.27221) ; Hammerman, A. et al. Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Vaccine after Recovery from Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 386, 1221–1229 (2022). (PMID: 10.1056/NEJMoa2119497) ; Torres, M. N., Barberia, I. & Rodríguez‐Ferreiro, J. Causal illusion as a cognitive basis of pseudoscientific beliefs. Br. J. Psychol. 111, 840–852 (2020). (PMID: 10.1111/bjop.12441) ; Galanis, P. et al. First COVID-19 Booster Dose in the General Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Willingness and Its Predictors. Vaccines 10, 1097 (2022). (PMID: 10.3390/vaccines10071097) ; Drew, L. Did COVID vaccine mandates work? What the data say. Nature 607, 22–25 (2022). (PMID: 10.1038/d41586-022-01827-4) ; Böhm, R. et al. Crowdsourcing interventions to promote uptake of COVID-19 booster vaccines. EClinicalMedicine 53, 101632 (2022). (PMID: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101632) ; Verger, P. et al. Vaccine hesitancy in health-care providers in Western countries: a narrative review. Expert Rev. Vaccines 1–19 https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2022.2056026 (2022). ; Loomba, S., Figueiredo, A., Piatek, S. J., Graaf, K. & Larson, H. J. Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 337–348 (2021). (PMID: 10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1) ; Dai, H. et al. Behavioural nudges increase COVID-19 vaccinations. Nature 597, 404–409 (2021). (PMID: 10.1038/s41586-021-03843-2) ; Batteux, E., Mills, F., Jones, L. F., Symons, C. & Weston, D. The Effectiveness of Interventions for Increasing COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake: A Systematic Review. Vaccines 10, 386 (2022). (PMID: 10.3390/vaccines10030386) ; Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Rothman, A. J., Leask, J. & Kempe, A. Increasing vaccination: putting psychological science into action. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 18, 149–207 (2017). (PMID: 10.1177/1529100618760521) ; Tentori, K. et al. Nudging COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake by Changing the Default: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Med. Decis. Mak. 42, 837–841 (2022). (PMID: 10.1177/0272989X221101536) ; Chapman, G. B., Li, M., Colby, H. & Yoon, H. Opting In vs Opting Out of Influenza Vaccination. JAMA 304, 43–44 (2010). (PMID: 10.1001/jama.2010.892) ; Milkman, K. L., Beshears, J., Choi, J. J., Laibson, D. & Madrian, B. C. Using implementation intentions prompts to enhance influenza vaccination rates. PNAS 108, 10415–10420 (2011). (PMID: 10.1073/pnas.1103170108) ; Milkman, K. L. et al. A megastudy of text-based nudges encouraging patients to get vaccinated at an upcoming doctor’s appointment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2101165118 (2021). (PMID: 10.1073/pnas.2101165118) ; Omer, S. B., Betsch, C. & Leask, J. Mandate vaccination with care. Nature 571, 469–472 (2019). (PMID: 10.1038/d41586-019-02232-0) ; Thaler, R. H. & Sunstein, C. R. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. (Penguin, 2009). ; SeyedAlinaghi, S. et al. Impact of COVID‐19 pandemic on routine vaccination coverage of children and adolescents: A systematic review. Health Sci. Rep. 5, e00516 (2022). ; Collis, A. et al. Global survey on COVID-19 beliefs, behaviours and norms. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01347-1 (2022). ; Dubé, E., Gagnon, D. & Vivion, M. Optimizing communication material to address vaccine hesitancy. CCDR 46, 48–52 (2020). (PMID: 10.14745/ccdr.v46i23a05) ; Petersen, M. B., Bor, A., Jørgensen, F. & Lindholt, M. F. Transparent communication about negative features of COVID-19 vaccines decreases acceptance but increases trust. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2024597118 (2021). (PMID: 10.1073/pnas.2024597118) ; Tjaden, J., Haarmann, E. & Savaskan, N. Experimental evidence on improving COVID-19 vaccine outreach among migrant communities on social media. Sci. Rep. 12, 16256 (2022). (PMID: 10.1038/s41598-022-20340-2) ; Kärki, K. Listening to vaccine refusers. Med. Health Care Philos. 25, 3–9 (2022). (PMID: 10.1007/s11019-021-10055-y) ; Wegwarth, O., Wagner, G. G., Spies, C. & Hertwig, R. Assessment of German public attitudes toward health communications with varying degrees of scientific uncertainty regarding COVID-19. JAMA Netw. Open 3, 2032335–2032335 (2020). (PMID: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.32335) ; Ali, N., Ashiru-Oredope, D. & Murdan, S. Training university students as vaccination champions to promote vaccination in their multiple identities and help address vaccine hesitancy. Pharm. Educ. 21, 407–419 (2021). (PMID: 10.46542/pe.2021.211.407419) ; Tuckerman, J., Kaufman, J. & Danchin, M. Effective Approaches to Combat Vaccine Hesitancy. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 41, e243–e245 (2022). (PMID: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003499) ; Schmid, P. & Betsch, C. Effective strategies for rebutting science denialism in public discussions. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 931–939 (2019). (PMID: 10.1038/s41562-019-0632-4) ; Schmid, P. & Betsch, C. Benefits and pitfalls of debunking interventions to counter mRNA vaccination misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci. Commun. 44, 531–558 (2022). (PMID: 10.1177/10755470221129608) ; Bollyky, T. J. et al. Pandemic preparedness and COVID-19: an exploratory analysis of infection and fatality rates, and contextual factors associated with preparedness in 177 countries, from Jan 1, 2020, to Sept 30, 2021. Lancet 399, 1489–1512 (2022). (PMID: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00172-6) ; Bartoš, V., Bauer, M., Cahlíková, J. & Chytilová, J. Communicating doctors’ consensus persistently increases COVID-19 vaccinations. Nature 606, 542–549 (2022). (PMID: 10.1038/s41586-022-04805-y) ; Dixon, G. N. & Clarke, C. E. Heightening Uncertainty Around Certain Science: Media Coverage, False Balance, and the Autism-Vaccine Controversy. Sci. Commun. 35, 358–382 (2013). (PMID: 10.1177/1075547012458290) ; Dixon, G. & Clarke, C. The effect of falsely balanced reporting of the autism-vaccine controversy on vaccine safety perceptions and behavioral intentions. Health Educ. Res. 28, 352–359 (2013). (PMID: 10.1093/her/cys110) ; Schmid, P., Schwarzer, M. & Betsch, C. Weight-of-Evidence Strategies to Mitigate the Influence of Messages of Science Denialism in Public Discussions. J. Cognit. 3, 36 (2020). (PMID: 10.5334/joc.125) ; Butler, R. & MacDonald, N. E. Diagnosing the determinants of vaccine hesitancy in specific subgroups: The Guide to Tailoring Immunization Programmes (TIP). Vaccine 33, 4176–4179 (2015). (PMID: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.038) ; Jama, A. et al. Design and implementation of tailored intervention to increase vaccine acceptance in a Somali community in Stockholm, Sweden—based on the Tailoring Immunization Programmes approach. Public Health Pract. 4, 100305 (2022). (PMID: 10.1016/j.puhip.2022.100305) ; Musa, S. et al. Tailoring Immunization Programmes: using patient file data to explore vaccination uptake and associated factors. Hum. Vaccines Immunotherapeutics 17, 228–236 (2021). (PMID: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1769396) ; Trifunović, V. et al. Understanding vaccination communication between health workers and parents: a Tailoring Immunization Programmes (TIP) qualitative study in Serbia. Hum. Vaccines Immunotherapeutics 18, 1913962 (2022). (PMID: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1913962) ; Neufeind, J. et al. Barriers and drivers to adult vaccination among family physicians—Insights for tailoring the immunization program in Germany. Vaccine https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.04.052 (2020). ; Musa, S. et al. Identifying barriers and drivers to vaccination: A qualitative interview study with health workers in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Vaccine 38, 1906–1914 (2020). (PMID: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.01.025) ; Gagneur, A. et al. Promoting vaccination in maternity wards—motivational interview technique reduces hesitancy and enhances intention to vaccinate, results from a multicentre non-controlled pre- and post-intervention RCT-nested study, Quebec, March 2014 to February 2015. Euro-. Surveill. 24, 1800641 (2019). (PMID: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.36.1800641) ; Lemaitre, T. et al. Impact of a vaccination promotion intervention using motivational interview techniques on long-term vaccine coverage: the PromoVac strategy. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 15, 732–739 (2019). (PMID: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1549451) ; Gagneur, A. et al. A postpartum vaccination promotion intervention using motivational interviewing techniques improves short-term vaccine coverage: PromoVac study. BMC Public Health 18, 811 (2018). (PMID: 10.1186/s12889-018-5724-y) ; Gagneur, A. Motivational interviewing: A powerful tool to address vaccine hesitancy. Can. Commun. Dis. Rep. 46, 93–97 (2020). (PMID: 10.14745/ccdr.v46i04a06) ; Miller, W. R. & Rollnick, S. Motivational interviewing: helping people change. (Guilford Press, 2013). ; Hornsey, M. J. & Fielding, K. S. Attitude roots and Jiu Jitsu persuasion: Understanding and overcoming the motivated rejection of science. Am. Psychol. 72, 459–473 (2017). (PMID: 10.1037/a0040437) ; Hornsey, M. J. Why Facts Are Not Enough: Understanding and Managing the Motivated Rejection of Science. Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci. 29, 583–591 (2020). (PMID: 10.1177/0963721420969364) ; Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. & Fielding, K. S. The psychological roots of anti-vaccination attitudes: A 24-nation investigation. Health Psychol. 37, 307–315 (2018). (PMID: 10.1037/hea0000586) ; Fasce, A. et al. (under review). A Taxonomy of Anti-Vaccination Arguments. Systematic Literature Review and Text Modeling. ; Gagneur, A., Bergeron, J., Gosselin, V., Farrands, A. & Baron, G. A complementary approach to the vaccination promotion continuum: An immunization-specific motivational-interview training for nurses. Vaccine 37, 2748–2756 (2019). (PMID: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.03.076) ; Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J. & Lombardi, D. Debunking Handbook 2020. https://doi.org/10.17910/B7.1182 (2020). ; Paynter, J. et al. Evaluation of a template for countering misinformation—Real-world Autism treatment myth debunking. PLoS ONE 14, e0210746 (2019). (PMID: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210746) ; Walter, N., Brooks, J. J., Saucier, C. J. & Suresh, S. Evaluating the Impact of Attempts to Correct Health Misinformation on Social Media: A Meta-Analysis. Health Commun. 36, 1776–1784 (2021). (PMID: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1794553) ; Chan, M. S., Jones, C. R., Hall Jamieson, K. & Albarracín, D. Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation. Psychol. Sci. 28, 1531–1546 (2017). (PMID: 10.1177/0956797617714579) ; Shang, J. et al. Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 11727–11734 (2020). (PMID: 10.1073/pnas.2003138117) ; Abu Abed, O. S. Gene therapy avenues and COVID-19 vaccines. Genes Immun. 22, 120–124 (2021). (PMID: 10.1038/s41435-021-00136-6) ; Aharon, D. et al. In vitro fertilization and early pregnancy outcomes after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. Obstet. Gynecol. 139, 490–497 (2022). (PMID: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004713) ; Morris, R. S. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein seropositivity from vaccination or infection does not cause sterility. Fs Rep. 2, 253–255 (2021). ; Orvieto, R. et al. Does mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine influence patients’ performance during IVF-ET cycle? Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 19, 1–4 (2021). (PMID: 10.1186/s12958-021-00757-6) ; Wesselink, A. K. et al. A prospective cohort study of COVID-19 vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 infection, and fertility. Am. J. Epidemiol. 191, 1383–1395 (2022). (PMID: 10.1093/aje/kwac011) ; Iacobucci, G. Covid-19: No evidence that vaccines can affect fertility, says new guidance. BMJ 372, n509 (2021). (PMID: 10.1136/bmj.n509)
- Substance Nomenclature: 0 (COVID-19 Vaccines)
- Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20221206 Date Completed: 20221215 Latest Revision: 20221229
- Update Code: 20240513
- PubMed Central ID: PMC9726862
|
