Zum Hauptinhalt springen

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound guided drainage of pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis after failure of percutaneous drainage.

Mack, S ; Galasso, D ; et al.
In: Surgical endoscopy, Jg. 37 (2023-04-01), Heft 4, S. 2626-2632
Online academicJournal

Titel:
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound guided drainage of pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis after failure of percutaneous drainage.
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: Mack, S ; Galasso, D ; Marx, M ; Robert, M ; Romailler, E ; Oumrani, SH ; Aslan, N ; Moschouri, E ; Schoepfer, A ; Godat, S
Link:
Zeitschrift: Surgical endoscopy, Jg. 37 (2023-04-01), Heft 4, S. 2626-2632
Veröffentlichung: 1992- : New York : Springer ; <i>Original Publication</i>: [Berlin] : Springer International, c1987-, 2023
Medientyp: academicJournal
ISSN: 1432-2218 (electronic)
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09741-6
Schlagwort:
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Acute Disease
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Drainage methods
  • Necrosis etiology
  • Necrosis surgery
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional
  • Pancreatitis etiology
  • Pancreatitis surgery
  • Pancreatic Pseudocyst diagnostic imaging
  • Pancreatic Pseudocyst surgery
  • Pancreatic Pseudocyst etiology
Sonstiges:
  • Nachgewiesen in: MEDLINE
  • Sprachen: English
  • Publication Type: Journal Article
  • Language: English
  • [Surg Endosc] 2023 Apr; Vol. 37 (4), pp. 2626-2632. <i>Date of Electronic Publication: </i>2022 Nov 11.
  • MeSH Terms: Pancreatitis* / etiology ; Pancreatitis* / surgery ; Pancreatic Pseudocyst* / diagnostic imaging ; Pancreatic Pseudocyst* / surgery ; Pancreatic Pseudocyst* / etiology ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Acute Disease ; Treatment Outcome ; Drainage / methods ; Necrosis / etiology ; Necrosis / surgery ; Ultrasonography, Interventional
  • References: Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG et al (2013) Classification of acute pancreatitis–2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 62(1):102–111. (PMID: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-30277923100216) ; Arvanitakis M, Dumonceau J-M, Albert J, Badaoui A, Bali MA, Barthet M et al (2018) Endoscopic management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) evidence-based multidisciplinary guidelines. Endoscopy 50(5):524–546. (PMID: 10.1055/a-0588-536529631305) ; Isayama H, Nakai Y, Rerknimitr R, Khor C, Lau J, Wang H-P et al (2016) Asian consensus statements on endoscopic management of walled-off necrosis. Part 2: endoscopic management. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 31(9):1555–1565. (PMID: 10.1111/jgh.1339827042957) ; van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, Hofker HS, Boermeester MA, Dejong CH et al (2010) A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 362(16):1491–1502. (PMID: 10.1056/NEJMoa090882120410514) ; Kwon YM, Gerdes H, Schattner MA, Brown KT, Covey AM, Getrajdman GI et al (2013) Management of peripancreatic fluid collections following partial pancreatectomy: a comparison of percutaneous versus EUS-guided drainage. Surg Endosc 27(7):2422–2427. (PMID: 10.1007/s00464-012-2752-z23361258) ; Keane MG, Sze SF, Cieplik N, Murray S, Johnson GJ, Webster GJ et al (2016) Endoscopic versus percutaneous drainage of symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections: a 14-year experience from a tertiary hepatobiliary centre. Surg Endosc 30(9):3730–3740. (PMID: 10.1007/s00464-015-4668-x26675934) ; Varadarajulu S, Lopes TL, Wilcox CM, Drelichman ER, Kilgore ML, Christein JD (2008) EUS versus surgical cyst-gastrostomy for management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 68(4):649–655. (PMID: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.05718547566) ; Johnson MD, Walsh RM, Henderson JM, Brown N, Ponsky J, Dumot J et al (2009) Surgical versus nonsurgical management of pancreatic pseudocysts. J Clin Gastroenterol 43(6):586–590. (PMID: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31817440be19077728) ; Xie L-T, Zhao Q-Y, Gu J-H, Ying H-J, Tian G, Jiang T-A (2019) Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided versus percutaneous drainage for the recurrent pancreatic fluid collections. Med Sci Monit 25:5785–5794. (PMID: 10.12659/MSM.915193313777486691748) ; Bang JY, Arnoletti JP, Holt BA, Sutton B, Hasan MK, Navaneethan U et al (2019) An endoscopic transluminal approach, compared with minimally invasive surgery, reduces complications and costs for patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 156(4):1027-1040.e3. (PMID: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.11.03130452918) ; Horvath K, Freeny P, Escallon J, Heagerty P, Comstock B, Glickerman DJ et al (2010) Safety and efficacy of video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement for infected pancreatic collections: a multicenter, prospective, single-arm phase 2 study. Arch Surg 145(9):817–825. (PMID: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.17820855750) ; Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, Baron TH, Hutter MM, Jacobson BC et al (2010) A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 71(3):446–454. (PMID: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.02720189503) ; Chandrasekhara V, Khashab MA, Muthusamy VR, Acosta RD, Agrawal D, ASGE Standards of Practice Committee et al (2017) Adverse events associated with ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 85(1):32–47. (PMID: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.06.05127546389) ; Itoi T, Binmoeller KF, Shah J, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Kurihara T et al (2012) Clinical evaluation of a novel lumen-apposing metal stent for endosonography-guided pancreatic pseudocyst and gallbladder drainage (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 75(4):870–876. (PMID: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.10.02022301347) ; Khan MA, Hammad T, Khan Z, Lee W, Gaidhane M, Tyberg A et al (2018) Endoscopic versus percutaneous management for symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 6(4):E474–E483. (PMID: 10.1055/s-0044-102299296073995876036) ; Akshintala VS, Saxena P, Zaheer A, Rana U, Hutfless SM, Lennon AM et al (2014) A comparative evaluation of outcomes of endoscopic versus percutaneous drainage for symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc 79(6):921–928 (quiz 983.e2, 983.e5). (PMID: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.10.03224315454) ; Dumonceau J-M, Delhaye M, Tringali A, Arvanitakis M, Sanchez-Yague A, Vaysse T et al (2019) Endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline–updated August 2018. Endoscopy 51(2):179–193. (PMID: 10.1055/a-0822-083230654394) ; Guo J, Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Fusaroli P, Giovannini M, Mishra G et al (2017) A multi-institutional consensus on how to perform endoscopic ultrasound-guided peri-pancreatic fluid collection drainage and endoscopic necrosectomy. Endosc Ultrasound 6(5):285–291. (PMID: 10.4103/eus.eus_85_17290638715664848) ; Lang GD, Fritz C, Bhat T, Das KK, Murad FM, Early DS et al (2018) EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing metal stents and plastic double-pigtail stents: comparison of efficacy and adverse event rates. Gastrointest Endosc 87(1):150–157. (PMID: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.02928713067) ; Brimhall B, Han S, Tatman PD, Clark TJ, Wani S, Brauer B et al (2018) Increased incidence of pseudoaneurysm bleeding with lumen-apposing metal stents compared to double-pigtail plastic stents in patients with peripancreatic fluid collections. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 16(9):1521–1528. (PMID: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.02.021294749706429551) ; Sharaiha RZ, Tyberg A, Khashab MA, Kumta NA, Karia K, Nieto J et al (2016) Endoscopic therapy with lumen-apposing metal stents is safe and effective for patients with pancreatic walled-off necrosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 14(12):1797–1803. (PMID: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.05.01127189914) ; Shah RJ, Shah JN, Waxman I, Kowalski TE, Sanchez-Yague A, Nieto J et al (2015) Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing covered self-expanding metal stents. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 13(4):747–752. (PMID: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.04725290534) ; Rinninella E, Kunda R, Dollhopf M, Sanchez-Yague A, Will U, Tarantino I et al (2015) EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections using a novel lumen-apposing metal stent on an electrocautery-enhanced delivery system: a large retrospective study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 82(6):1039–1046. (PMID: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.00626014960) ; Dhir V, Teoh AYB, Bapat M, Bhandari S, Joshi N, Maydeo A (2015) EUS-guided pseudocyst drainage: prospective evaluation of early removal of fully covered self-expandable metal stents with pancreatic ductal stenting in selected patients. Gastrointest Endosc 82(4):650–657 (quiz 718.e1-5). (PMID: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.06125910662)
  • Contributed Indexing: Keywords: Endoscopic ultrasound; Endoscopic ultrasound guided drainage; Pancreatic collections; Percutaneous drainage; Pseudocyst; Walled of necrosis
  • Entry Date(s): Date Created: 20221112 Date Completed: 20230411 Latest Revision: 20230412
  • Update Code: 20231215

Klicken Sie ein Format an und speichern Sie dann die Daten oder geben Sie eine Empfänger-Adresse ein und lassen Sie sich per Email zusenden.

oder
oder

Wählen Sie das für Sie passende Zitationsformat und kopieren Sie es dann in die Zwischenablage, lassen es sich per Mail zusenden oder speichern es als PDF-Datei.

oder
oder

Bitte prüfen Sie, ob die Zitation formal korrekt ist, bevor Sie sie in einer Arbeit verwenden. Benutzen Sie gegebenenfalls den "Exportieren"-Dialog, wenn Sie ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm verwenden und die Zitat-Angaben selbst formatieren wollen.

xs 0 - 576
sm 576 - 768
md 768 - 992
lg 992 - 1200
xl 1200 - 1366
xxl 1366 -