Recognition and reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions by surveyed healthcare professionals in Uganda: key determinants.
In: BMJ open, Jg. 4 (2014-11-24), Heft 11, S. e005869
Online
academicJournal
Zugriff:
Objective: To assess extent and determinants of past-month recognition of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADR) and past-year ADR reporting among healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Uganda.
Setting: Geographically diverse health facilities (public, private for-profit, private not-for-profit).
Participants: Of 2000 questionnaires distributed, 1345 were completed: return rate of 67%.
Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures: Per cent HCPs who suspected ADR in the past month; reported ADR in the past year.
Results: Nurses were the majority (59%, 792/1345). Only half the respondents had heard about pharmacovigilance: 39% of nurses (295/763; 95% CI 35% to 42%), 70% otherwise (383/547; 95% CI 66% to 74%). One fifth (268/1289 or 21%; 95% CI 19% to 23%) had suspected an ADR in the previous 4 weeks, 111 of them were nurses; 15% (190/1296) had reported a suspected ADR in the past year, 103 of them were nurses. Past-month ADR suspicion was more likely by non-nurses (OR=1.7, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.40) and with medical research involvement (OR=1.5, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.15) but past-month receipt of patient ADR-complaint predominated (OR=19, 95% CI 14 to 28). Past-year ADR reporting was higher by hospital staff (OR=1.9, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.10), especially in medicine (OR=2.3, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.73); but lower from private for-profit health facilities (OR=0.5, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.77) and by older staff (OR=0.6, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.91); more likely by HCPs who had ever encountered a fatal ADR (OR=2.9, 95% CI 1.94 to 4.25), knew to whom to report (OR=1.7, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.46), or suggested how to improve ADR reporting (OR=1.6, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.49). Two attitudinal factors were important: diffidence and lethargy.
Conclusions: One in five HCPs suspected an ADR in the past-month and one in seven reported ADR in the previous year. Empowering patients could strengthen ADR detection and reporting in Africa.
(Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)
Titel: |
Recognition and reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions by surveyed healthcare professionals in Uganda: key determinants.
|
---|---|
Autor/in / Beteiligte Person: | Kiguba, R ; Karamagi, C ; Waako, P ; Ndagije, HB ; Bird, SM |
Link: | |
Zeitschrift: | BMJ open, Jg. 4 (2014-11-24), Heft 11, S. e005869 |
Veröffentlichung: | [London] : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2011-, 2014 |
Medientyp: | academicJournal |
ISSN: | 2044-6055 (electronic) |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005869 |
Schlagwort: |
|
Sonstiges: |
|